Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials Comparing Efficacy, Safety, and Satisfaction Between Ablative and Non-Ablative Lasers in Facial and Hand Rejuvenation/Resurfacing Publisher Pubmed



Seirafianpour F1 ; Pour Mohammad A1 ; Moradi Y2 ; Dehghanbanadaki H3 ; Panahi P1 ; Goodarzi A4, 5 ; Mozafarpoor S6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  3. 3. Students’ Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Dermatology, Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Skin and Stem Cell Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Dermatology, Skin Diseases and Leishmaniasis Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Lasers in Medical Science Published:2022


Abstract

Skin aging inevitably begins from the very early days of life. The lasers used in skin rejuvenation are mainly of two types: ablative and non-ablative. This meta-analysis aimed at comparing ablative with non-ablative lasers in terms of their efficacy and safety in skin rejuvenation. Articles published by March 15, 2020 in Embase, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicalTrials.gov were searched. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in English using ablative and non-ablative lasers and comparing their safety and efficiency in wrinkle improvement and photoaging therapy. Out of 1353 extracted articles, 11 were selected for qualitative synthesis and of these, 4 were quantitatively analyzed. Different modes of various lasers were implemented; the ablative lasers included Erbium: yttrium–aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) and CO2, besides the non-ablative lasers, comprised Ytterbium/Erbium, Erbium: Glass, neodymium: yttrium–aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG), and alexandrite. Pooled analyses on 124 participants showed insignificant differences between ablative and non-ablative lasers in the likelihood of excellent improvement with an odds ratio of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.24, 2.83). The analyses also showed good improvement with an odds ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.78), fair improvement with an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.56, 2.26) and side effects with an odds ratio of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.56). The efficacy and safety of ablative laser were not higher than those of non-ablative laser in skin rejuvenation. Given the small samples of the included articles, it is recommended that further high-quality RCTs be conducted using larger samples to confirm this conclusion. © 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature.
Other Related Docs