Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Recurrent Hyperactive Esr1 Fusion Proteins in Endocrine Therapy-Resistant Breast Cancer Publisher Pubmed



Hartmaier RJ1, 2, 3, 18 ; Trabucco SE1 ; Priedigkeit N2, 3 ; Chung JH1 ; Parachoniak CA1 ; Vanden Borre P1 ; Morley S1 ; Rosenzweig M1 ; Gay LM1 ; Goldberg ME1 ; Suh J1 ; Ali SM1 ; Ross J1 ; Leylandjones B4 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Hartmaier RJ1, 2, 3, 18
  2. Trabucco SE1
  3. Priedigkeit N2, 3
  4. Chung JH1
  5. Parachoniak CA1
  6. Vanden Borre P1
  7. Morley S1
  8. Rosenzweig M1
  9. Gay LM1
  10. Goldberg ME1
  11. Suh J1
  12. Ali SM1
  13. Ross J1
  14. Leylandjones B4
  15. Young B4
  16. Williams C4
  17. Park B5
  18. Tsai M6
  19. Haley B7
  20. Peguero J8
  21. Callahan RD9
  22. Sachelarie I10
  23. Cho J11
  24. Atkinson JM3
  25. Bahreini A3, 12, 13
  26. Nagle AM2, 3
  27. Puhalla SL3, 14
  28. Watters RJ2, 3, 15
  29. Erdoganyildirim Z3, 12
  30. Cao L3, 16
  31. Oesterreich S2, 3
  32. Mathew A14
  33. Lucas PC17
  34. Davidson NE14
  35. Brufsky AM14
  36. Frampton GM1
  37. Stephens PJ1
  38. Chmielecki J1
  39. Lee AV2, 3

Source: Annals of Oncology Published:2018


Abstract

Background: Estrogen receptor-positive (ER-positive) metastatic breast cancer is often intractable due to endocrine therapy resistance. Although ESR1 promoter switching events have been associated with endocrine-therapy resistance, recurrent ESR1 fusion proteins have yet to be identified in advanced breast cancer. Patients and methods: To identify genomic structural rearrangements (REs) including gene fusions in acquired resistance, we undertook a multimodal sequencing effort in three breast cancer patient cohorts: (i) mate-pair and/or RNAseq in 6 patientmatched primary-metastatic tumors and 51 metastases, (ii) high coverage (≥ 500×) comprehensive genomic profiling of 287- 395 cancer-related genes across 9542 solid tumors (5216 from metastatic disease), and (iii) ultra-high coverage ( > 5000×) genomic profiling of 62 cancer-related genes in 254 ctDNA samples. In addition to traditional gene fusion detection methods (i.e. discordant reads, split reads), ESR1 REs were detected from targeted sequencing data by applying a novel algorithm (copyshift) that identifies major copy number shifts at rearrangement hotspots. Results: We identify 88 ESR1 REs across 83 unique patients with direct confirmation of 9 ESR1 fusion proteins (including 2 via immunoblot). ESR1 REs are highly enriched in ER-positive, metastatic disease and co-occur with known ESR1 missense alterations, suggestive of polyclonal resistance. Importantly, all fusions result from a breakpoint in or near ESR1 intron 6 and therefore lack an intact ligand binding domain (LBD). In vitro characterization of three fusions reveals ligand-independence and hyperactivity dependent upon the 30 partner gene. Our lower-bound estimate of ESR1 fusions is at least 1% of metastatic solid breast cancers, the prevalence in ctDNA is at least 10× enriched. We postulate this enrichment may represent secondary resistance to more aggressive endocrine therapies applied to patients with ESR1 LBD missense alterations. Conclusions: Collectively, these data indicate that N-terminal ESR1 fusions involving exons 6-7 are a recurrent driver of endocrine therapy resistance and are impervious to ER-targeted therapies. © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved.