Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Clinically Observed Estrogen Receptor Alpha Mutations Within the Ligand-Binding Domain Confer Distinguishable Phenotypes Publisher Pubmed



Jia S1, 2, 3 ; Miedel MT2, 3 ; Ngo M2, 3 ; Hessenius R2, 3 ; Chen N2, 3 ; Wang P1, 4 ; Bahreini A4, 5, 9 ; Li Z4, 6 ; Ding Z2, 3 ; Shun TY2, 3 ; Zuckerman DM7 ; Taylor DL2, 3, 8 ; Puhalla SL4 ; Lee AV4, 5, 6 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Jia S1, 2, 3
  2. Miedel MT2, 3
  3. Ngo M2, 3
  4. Hessenius R2, 3
  5. Chen N2, 3
  6. Wang P1, 4
  7. Bahreini A4, 5, 9
  8. Li Z4, 6
  9. Ding Z2, 3
  10. Shun TY2, 3
  11. Zuckerman DM7
  12. Taylor DL2, 3, 8
  13. Puhalla SL4
  14. Lee AV4, 5, 6
  15. Oesterreich S4, 6
  16. Stern AM2, 3
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
  2. 2. Drug Discovery Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Biomedical Science Tower W950, 200 Lothrop Street, Pittsburgh, 15261, PA, United States
  3. 3. Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  4. 4. Womens Cancer Research Center, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Center, Magee-Womens Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Human Genetics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  6. 6. Department of Pharmacology and Chemical Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  7. 7. School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, United States
  8. 8. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
  9. 9. Department of Medical Genetic and Molecular Biology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Oncology (Switzerland) Published:2018


Abstract

Objective: Twenty to fifty percent of estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancers express mutations within the ER ligand-binding domain. While most studies focused on the constitutive ER signaling activity commonly engendered by these mutations selected during estrogen deprivation therapy, our study was aimed at investigating distinctive phenotypes conferred by different mutations within this class. Methods: We examined the two most prevalent mutations, D538G and Y537S, employing corroborative genome-edited and lentiviral-transduced ER+ T47D cell models. We used a luciferase-based reporter and endogenous phospho-ER immunoblot analysis to characterize the estrogen response of ER mutants and determined their resistance to known ER antagonists. Results: Consistent with their selection during estrogen deprivation therapy, these mutants conferred constitutive ER activity. While Y537S mutants showed no estrogen dependence, D538G mutants demonstrated an enhanced estrogen-dependent response. Both mutations conferred resistance to ER antagonists that was overcome at higher doses acting specifically through their ER target. Conclusions: These observations provide a tenable hypothesis for how D538G ESR1-expressing clones can contribute to shorter progression-free survival observed in the exemestane arm of the BOLERO-2 study. Thus, in those patients with dominant D538G-expressing clones, longitudinal analysis for this mutation in circulating free DNA may prove beneficial for informing more optimal therapeutic regimens. © 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel. All rights reserved.