Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Breaking Down Barriers and Building up Facilitators of Lecture Free Curriculum in Medical Education: An Interpretive Structural Modeling Publisher Pubmed



Karami S1 ; Shariati M2 ; Parmelee D3 ; Shahsavari H4 ; Sadeghian A5 ; Alvarez RB6 ; Zitouni A6 ; Alizadeh M7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Medical Education Department, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Medical Education and Department of Community Medicine, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Psychiatry & Pediatrics, Wright State University Boonshoft School of Medicine, Dayton, OH, United States
  4. 4. Medical-Surgical Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. School of Medicine, Education Development Office (EDO), Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of General and Specifics Didactics and Educational Theory, Faculty of Education, Universidad de Leon, Leon, Spain
  7. 7. Department of Medical Education, School of Medicine and Health Professions Education Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Tehran, Iran

Source: Medical Teacher Published:2024


Abstract

Introduction: The field of medical education has seen a growing interest in lecture free curriculum. However, it comes with its own set of challenges and obstacles. In this article, we aim to identify the prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and examine their interrelationships using interpretive structural modeling (ISM) technique. Methods: In this mixed-method study initially, we performed a scoping review and semi-structured interviews and determined the main prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers of lecture-free curriculum in medical education using qualitative content analysis approach. The interrelationships among these components were investigated using ISM. Therefore, self-interactive structural matrices were formed, initial and final reachability matrices were achieved, and MICMAC analysis was conducted to classify the factors. Results: Finally, two ISM models of prerequisites and facilitators with 27 factors in 10 levels and challenges and obstacles with 25 factors in eight levels were developed. Each of the models was divided into three parts: key, strategic, and dependent factors. ‘Providing relevant evidence regarding lecture free curriculum’ emerged as the most important prerequisite and facilitator, and ‘insufficient support from the university’ was identified as the most critical barrier and challenge. Conclusions: The study highlights the significant importance of lecture-free curriculum in medical education and provides insights into its prerequisites, facilitators, challenges, and barriers. The findings can be utilized by educational managers and decision-makers to implement necessary changes in the design and implementation of lecture-free in medical education, leading to more effective improvements in the quality and success of education. © 2024 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Other Related Docs
9. Teaching Self-Efficacy and Its Effects on Quality of Bedside Teaching: Findings From a Multi-Center Survey, Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism (2022)
10. Hidden Curriculum in Medical Residency Programs: A Scoping Review, Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism (2022)
12. Designing Virtual Patients for Education of Nursing Students in Cancer Course, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2021)
14. Development and Validation of the Clinical Information Literacy Questionnaire, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2023)
16. Medical Library and Information Sciences Educational Barriers: A Qualitative Study, Journal of Education for Library and Information Science (2023)
26. How to Develop an Undergraduate Medical Professionalism Curriculum: Experts’ Perception and Suggestion, Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism (2019)
27. Patient Education Information Material Assessment Criteria: A Scoping Review, Health Information and Libraries Journal (2023)
28. Inadequate Investment on Management of Diabetes Education, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2012)
32. Identifying the Challenges to Good Clinical Rounds: A Focus-Group Study of Medical Teachers, Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism (2019)
38. Generational Characteristics of General Medicine Students in Iran, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2022)