Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Marginal Accuracy of Lithium Disilicate Full-Coverage Single Crowns Made by Direct and Indirect Digital or Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed

Summary: A meta-analysis found digital scanners match traditional methods for accurate dental crown fits. #DentalCare #Technology

Tabesh M1 ; Nejatidanesh F2 ; Savabi G2 ; Davoudi A3 ; Savabi O1
Authors

Source: Journal of Prosthodontics Published:2022


Abstract

Purpose: Several studies have compared digital intraoral scanners and conventional impressions. The accuracy of these two methods in terms of marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns is not well-established, yet. The purpose of this study was to systematically review available publications on marginal fit of single-unit, full-coverage, tooth-supported lithium disilicate restorations. Methods: Pubmed, Web of Science, Cochrane, EMBASE, and Scopus were electronically searched along with a manual search. After critical appraisal, data from selected studies were extracted and mean marginal difference with a 95% confidence interval was calculated. Meta-analysis of the collected data was conducted using STATA software. Results: The meta-analysis revealed similar marginal gap values in intraoral scanners with conventional groups (p>0.05) and in intraoral scanners with extraoral canners (p>0.05). Conclusion: No significant difference was seen between digital and conventional impressions or intra- and extraoral scanners for marginal accuracy of lithium disilicate crowns. © 2022 by the American College of Prosthodontists.
Other Related Docs
15. The Effects of Custom Tray Material on the Accuracy of Master Casts, Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (2008)