Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! By
Efficacy of a Metal Artifact Reduction Algorithm in Cbct Images of Teeth With Ceramic Brackets With/Without Coated Archwires: An in Vitro Study Publisher Pubmed



P Soltani PARISA ; M Cernera MARIANGELA ; M Kachuie MARZIE ; A Moaddabi AMIRHOSSEIN ; M Khoramian MEHRAN ; G Spagnuolo GIANRICO ; Ng Armogida Niccolo GIUSEPPE ; C Rengo CARLO
Authors

Source: Clinical and Experimental Dental Research Published:2025


Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of a metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm for cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of teeth with ceramic brackets with/without coated archwires. Material and Methods: In this in vitro study, 10 ceramic brackets were bonded to maxillary anterior teeth from the second premolar of one side to the second premolar of the other side on a dry human skull. CBCT scans (85 kVp, 8 mA, 14.5 s) were taken twice in the presence and absence of coated nickel–titanium (NiTi) archwires. The skull was placed in a water container for soft tissue simulation during scanning. The images were reconstructed with and without the MAR algorithm, and imported to ImageJ software in DICOM format to calculate the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at 15-, 20-, and 25-mm distances from the tooth center. Data were analyzed by independent t-test, ANOVA, and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05). Results: Application of the MAR algorithm had no significant effect on the CNR in the presence or absence of archwire (p > 0.05). Significant differences were found in the CNR according to tooth type and distance from the tooth center, such that the CNR significantly increased in farther distances (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, the results showed that the application of the MAR algorithm had no significant efficacy in improving the quality of CBCT scans of teeth with ceramic brackets with/without coated archwire. © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
13. Accuracy of Tooth-Implant Impressions: Comparison of Five Different Techniques, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2023)