Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Scoping Literature Review of the Provision of Orthoses and Prostheses in Resourcelimited Environments 2000-2010. Part Two: Research and Outcomes Publisher Pubmed



Ikeda AJ1 ; Grabowski AM2, 4 ; Lindsley A1 ; Sadeghidemneh E3 ; Reisinger KD1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Whirlwind Wheelchair International, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, SCI 251, San Francisco, 94132, CA, United States
  2. 2. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
  3. 3. Musculoskeletal Research Center, Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Eastern Colorado Healthcare System, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Denver, CO, United States

Source: Prosthetics and Orthotics International Published:2014


Abstract

Background: Despite the activities of many orthotic and prosthetic provision organizations in resource-limited environments, there is still a great need and there are several areas for improvement, as identified in Part One of this series. Objectives: Our goal was to examine outcomes and conclusions of research studies to produce an evidence base for determining factors that may lead to successful provision of orthoses and prostheses in resource-limited environments. Study design: Literature review. Methods: We conducted a scoping literature review of all information related to orthotic and prosthetic provision in resource-limited environments published from 2000 to 2010. We extracted measured outcomes reported in all types of articles and analyzed conclusions from research studies. Results: Reported outcomes included durability, cost, satisfaction, use/nonuse of device, amount of utilization, walking speed, discomfort, pain, fit, misalignment, capacity for service provision, number of devices produced or delivered, and number of graduates from training programs. Conclusions: There are many gaps in the evidence base, notably in measuring inclusion, participation, and quality of life for orthosis and prosthesis users in resource-limited environments. There is a paucity of reported outcomes for orthotics. Valid, reliable, and standard methods of data collection and reporting are needed to advance the field and enhance the evidence base. Copyright © 2013 The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics.
Other Related Docs
13. Fixed Versus Mobile Weight-Bearing Prosthesis in Total Knee Arthroplasty, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2012)
29. Influential Factors in Stability of Lower-Limb Amputees, American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (2013)