Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Relationship Between False Positive Screening Results of Down Syndrome and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes Publisher



Honarjoo M1 ; Kohan S2 ; Tarrahi M3 ; Zarean E4 ; Sepahi S5 ; Safari Z6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Reproductive Sciences and Sexual Health Research Center, Department of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Fetal Medicine Unit, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Deputy of Food and Drug, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. PhD Student in Reproductive Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Published:2023


Abstract

Background: Maternal serum sample screening in the first and second trimesters has been commonly used to identify women who are at risk of fetal trisomy 21. In addition, these serum markers are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Hence, the present study was conducted to determine the relationship between false positive screening results of Down syndrome and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Material and Methods: This prospective, two-group, cohort study was conducted on 608 pregnant women who had undergone fetal contingent screening. They were selected through convenience sampling in the twentieth week of pregnancy and were followed up until delivery. The raw Odd Ratios (OR), Relative Risk (RR), and adjusted OR of adverse pregnancy outcomes were calculated in the false positive and true negative groups. Results: The adjusted OR of developing preeclampsia was 1.98 (95% CI: 1.14-3.42), and its RR was 2.13 (95% CI: 1.34-3.38) times higher in the false positive group. Moreover, the adjusted OR of Small for Gestational Age (SGA) was 2.80 (95% CI: 1.76-4.47), and its RR was 2.28 (95% CI: 1.54-3.36) times higher in the false positive group. The adjusted OR of Low Birth Weight (LBW) was 3.34 (95% CI: 1.97-5.64), and its RR was 2.65 (95% CI: 1.72-4.11) times higher in the false positive group. In addition, no significant difference was observed between false positive and true negative groups in terms of preterm birth. Conclusions: Women with a false positive fetal screening test result are more likely to suffer from preeclampsia, SGA, and LBW and require planned prenatal care. © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
13. Risk Factors of Placental Abruption, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2013)
16. The Uterocervical Angle-Cervical Length Ratio: A Promising Predictor of Preterm Birth?, International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2024)
24. Alterations of Epigenetic Landscape in Down Syndrome Carrying Pregnancies: A Systematic Review of Case-Control Studies, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (2021)
30. Effect of Maternal Age on Pregnancy Outcome, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2011)