Intravitreal Diclofenac Plus Bevacizumab Versus Bevacizumab Alone in Treatment-Naive Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Ghanbari H^{1, 2} ; Kianersi F^{1, 2} ; Sonbolestan SA^{1, 2} ; Abtahi MA^{1, 2} ; Akbari M³ ; Abtahi ZA^{1, 2} ; Abtahi SH^{1, 2} Show Affiliations
Source: International Ophthalmology Published:2017

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term effects of a single intravitreal injection of 1.25 mg Bevacizumab combined with 300 lg/0.1 mL Diclofenac (IVB/D) versus 1.25 mg intravitreal Bevacizumab (IVB) alone in the treatment of naive diabetic macular edema (DME). In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, 80 eyes were included in the final analysis; 42 and 38 of which in the IVB and IVB/D groups, respectively. The primary outcome measure was a change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR at week 4. The secondary outcomes included changes in central macular thickness (CMT), macular volume, and potential injection-related complications. Significant improvement of BCVA was demonstrated in both study arms (mean reductions in LogMAR: −0.088 ± 0.278, −0.228 ± 0.330 for IVB and IVB/D, respectively). The difference in BCVA changes was in favor of IVB/D; however, not to a statistically significant level (P = 0.160). Significant reduction of CMT was documented in both study arms (mean reductions: 82.43 ± 160.09 and 153.26 ± 163.85 for IVB and IVB + IVD, respectively). Comparison of CMT changes between groups showed that IVB/D reduced CMT more than that of IVB (P = 0.04). Effects on macular volume corresponded to those of CMT. No injection-related complications or significant alterations in intraocular pressure were observed in any of the study arms. In treatment-naive DME, superiority of IVB/D combination therapy over IVB monotherapy may exist; especially as regards anatomical features. In our therapeutic arsenal for DME, IVD can be added as an adjunct to Bevacizumab. © 2016, Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.