Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Diagnostic Value of Antibody Testing in Comparison With Lung Scan and Pcr in Patients Suspected of Having Covid-19 Publisher



Shirani K1 ; Hajihashemi M2 ; Mortazavi A3 ; Assadi A3 ; Baradaran A4 ; Ataei B5 ; Badei H5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Infectious Diseases, Nosocomial Infection Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Immunodeficiency Diseases Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Pathology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Infectious Diseases, Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Microbiology Published:2024


Abstract

Background and Objectives: SARS-CoV-2 is a newly discovered viral infection. It’s still unclear how antibodies react in infected individuals, and there is not enough evidence to support the clinical use of antibody examination. This study evaluates the diagnostic value of serologic tests for diagnosing COVID-19. Materials and Methods: 32 patients for whom serologic testing was performed within 7 to 21 days from symptom onset and whether they were diagnosed with COVID-19 by both PCR and lung HRCT as gold standard tests at the same time, were included in the study. Results: Serologic tests (IgM / IgG) compared to PCR and lung HRCT scan to diagnose COVID-19, were 89.3% specific and 59.6% sensitive. Positive predictive value (PPV) was 95% and negative predictive value (NPV) was 37%. The diagnostic accuracy index of the serologic test was 0.745 (CI 0.651-0.838) (p-value <0.001). Conclusion: Serologic testing can be a complementary alternative for SARA-CoV-2 nucleic acid RT-PCR, although it cannot replace it completely. IgG/IgM combo test kits and RT-PCR together can give more insight into the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. © 2024 The Authors.
Other Related Docs
9. Clinical Display, Diagnostics and Genetic Implication of Novel Coronavirus (Covid-19) Epidemic, European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences (2020)
12. Recent Findings of Coronavirus: The Pathogenesis and Treatment, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2020)
13. Sars-Cov-2 (Covid-19): New Discoveries and Current Challenges, Applied Sciences (Switzerland) (2020)
15. Epidemiology, Virology, Clinical Features, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Sars-Cov-2 Infection, Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey) (2021)
19. The Molecular Basis of Covid-19 Pathogenesis, Conventional and Nanomedicine Therapy, International Journal of Molecular Sciences (2021)
25. A Comprehensive Review of Therapeutic Options for Covid-19, Ethiopian Journal of Health Development (2022)
26. Covid-19 Management in the Emergency Ward, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2021)
28. A Narrative Review of Covid-19: The New Pandemic Disease, Iranian Journal of Medical Sciences (2020)
37. Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Pictorial Review of Ct Findings and Differential Diagnosis, Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine (2021)
40. Epidemiological Study of Covid-19 in Iran and the World: A Review Study, Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets (2022)