Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Artificial Intelligence in the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Publisher Pubmed



Nabizadeh F1, 2 ; Masrouri S3 ; Ramezannezhad E4 ; Ghaderi A5 ; Sharafi AM5 ; Soraneh S6 ; Naser Moghadasi A7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Neuroscience Research Group (NRG), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. School of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  5. 5. Student's Scientific Research Center, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. School of Medicine, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
  7. 7. Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Neuroscience institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Published:2022


Abstract

Background:: In recent years Artificial intelligence (AI) techniques are rapidly evolving into clinical practices such as diagnosis and prognosis processes, assess treatment effectiveness, and monitoring of diseases. The previous studies showed interesting results regarding the diagnostic efficiency of AI methods in differentiating Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients from healthy controls or other demyelinating diseases. There is a great lack of a comprehensive systematic review study on the role of AI in the diagnosis of MS. We aimed to perform a systematic review to document the performance of AI in MS diagnosis. Methods:: A systematic search was performed using four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE on August 2021. All original studies which focused on deep learning or AI to analyze any modalities with the purpose of diagnosing MS were included in our study. Results:: Finally, 38 studies were included in our systematic review after the abstract and full-text screening. A total of 5433 individuals were included, including 2924 cases of MS and 2509 healthy controls. Sensitivity and specificity were reported in 29 studies which ranged from 76.92 to 100 for sensitivity and 74 to 100 for specificity. Furthermore, 34 studies reported accuracy ranged 81 to 100. Among included studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) (20 studies), OCT (six studies), serum and cerebrospinal fluid markers (six studies), movement function (three studies), and other modalities such as breathing and evoked potential was used for detecting MS via AI. Conclusion:: In conclusion, diagnosis of MS based on new markers and AI is a growing field of research with MRI images, followed by images obtained from OCT, serum and CSF biomarkers, and motor associated markers. All of these results show that with advances made in AI, the way we monitor and diagnose our MS patients can change drastically. © 2022
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
10. Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran, International Review of Neurobiology (2007)
22. Thalamic Asymmetry in Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2023)
26. Concurrent Glioma and Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review of Case Reports, Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders (2024)
28. Prevalence of Familial Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2011)
48. Clinical and Epidemiological Aspects of Multiple Sclerosis in Children, Iranian Journal of Child Neurology (2017)