Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Investigation of Sensitivity, Specificity and Accuracy of Tetra Primer Arms Pcr Method in Comparison With Conventional Arms Pcr, Based on Sequencing Technique Outcomes in Ivs-Ii-I Genotyping of Beta Thalassemia Patients Publisher Pubmed



Honardoost MA1 ; Tabatabaeian H2 ; Akbari M3 ; Salehi M3, 4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Division of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Genetics Division, Biology Department, Faculty of Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Medical Genetics Center of Genome, Isfahan, Shariati St., Iran

Source: Gene Published:2014


Abstract

Purpose: Beta thalassemia is one of the most important hematic diseases all around the world and solving the problems caused by this abnormality is strongly dependent on precise detection and reliable screening of high-risk couples. The aim of our study was the investigation of sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Tetra primer ARMS PCR method comparing with conventional ARMS PCR, based on sequencing technique outcomes for genotyping of IVS-II-I mutation in beta thalassemia patients. Methods: Fifty seven samples including two homozygote, 49 heterozygote and 6 normal specimens were analyzed by Tetra primer ARMS PCR and conventional ARMS PCR methods. DNA was extracted by the standard method of salting out for leukocyte genomic DNA extraction of blood specimens and a high pure PCR template preparation kit was used for DNA purification of CVS samples. The results obtained by Tetra primer ARMS PCR and conventional ARMS PCR methods were compared with gold standard technique, i.e. sequencing. Results: All three parameters including specificity, sensitivity and accuracy were 100% for Tetra primer ARMS PCR method, while they were 100%, 92.45% and 92.7% for conventional ARMS PCR technique respectively. Comparing with Tetra primer ARMS PCR which represented 100% agreement with sequencing method, conventional ARMS PCR technique only showed 47.1% agreement, because of 4 discordant results. Conclusion: Tetra primer ARMS PCR method is an almost reliable, sensitive and accurate technique and it is suggested that it can be used as a complementary method for diagnostic cases instead of conventional ARMS PCR method. This suggestion originated with perfect rate of agreement between outcomes of sequencing method, as a gold standard method of detecting the mutations, and Tetra primer ARMS PCR technique comparing with conventional ARMS PCR method. © 2014 Elsevier B.V.
Experts (# of related papers)