Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Key Indicators for Monitoring the Efficiency of Iranian Health System: A Synthesized Design Study



Jaafaripooyan E1 ; Daroudi R1 ; Damiri S1, 2 ; Mousavi A1 ; Mohamadi E3 ; Takian A1, 3, 4 ; Olyaeemanesh A3, 5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Management, Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. National Center for Health Insurance Research, Iran Health Insurance Organization, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Health Equity Research Center (HERC), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Global Health & Public Policy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health Economics, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Public Health Published:2024

Abstract

Background: A significant share of medical care, primary health care, and health-related education and research in Iran is provided by the Ministry of Health and its affiliated universities of medical sciences. We aimed to identify a set of key metrics for monitoring their efficiency in the four areas of medical care, primary healthcare, education and research. Methods: A combination of scoping review, expert panel and Delphi method was used. First, the relevant keywords were searched in the appropriate databases between 2000 and 2020. The final extracted indicators then reviewed, reduced and refined through the expert panel meetings. The last metrics were established following a three-stage Delphi study. Results: Out of 2327 studies, 155 were selected following the different screening stages of scoping review. After summarizing and refining the indicators via several expert panel meetings and the Delphi method, a total of36 key indicators were considered appropriate for measuring efficiency of the health system, 23 of which were for the sub-systems of public health (4 indicators), medical services (10 indicators), education (4 indicators) and research (5 indicators) and 13 indicators for the whole system efficiency. Conclusion: The set of indicators presented representing both the technical and allocative efficiency, might bea reliable basis for designing information systems and management dashboards for periodic monitoring of health system efficiency at national, regional and local levels. © 2024 Jaafaripooyan et al.