Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A New Approach to Test Validity and Clinical Usefulness of the 2013 Acc/Aha Guideline on Statin Therapy: A Population-Based Study Publisher Pubmed



Khalili D1, 2 ; Asgari S1 ; Hadaegh F1 ; Steyerberg EW3 ; Rahimi K4 ; Fahimfar N5 ; Azizi F6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Prevention of Metabolic Disorders Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, PO Box 19395, Tehran, 4763, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
  4. 4. George Institute for Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
  5. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Endocrine Research Center, Research Institute for Endocrine Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: International Journal of Cardiology Published:2015


Abstract

Background: The ACC/AHA released a new guideline onthe assessment of cardiovascular risk and management of hypercholesterolemia that some controversy exists concerning its usefulness. We examined the clinical usefulness of this guideline in a high incidence population using novel measures. Methods: First, we validated the new risk equation in a cohort of 2372 men and 2781 women aged 40-75 years. Then, high risk individuals for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) were identified according to the ACC/AHA guideline at baseline (as a predictor) and CVD outcomes were detected during a 10-year follow-up. Discrimination of the guideline was quantified and the quality of decisions was evaluated by Net Benefit Fraction index considering the harm, for false-positive, and benefit, for true-positive predictions. Finally, net number needed to treat (NNT) for statin was estimated, using test tradeoff index, in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. Results: During follow-up, 726 CVD events including 298 hard CVDs occurred. The equation overestimated the risk by 57% in men and 48% in women. Based on the guideline, 73% of men and 44% of women were eligible for statin therapy. The lowest sensitivity was detected for intensive treatment in non-diabetic subgroups (82% in men and 41% in women; corresponding specificity, 52% and 90% respectively). The guideline had a significant net benefit for both moderate and intensive treatment, which resulted in estimated NNTs ranged 5-55; however, net benefit of intensive therapy was uncertain in non-diabetic women. Conclusions: We objectively showed that the ACC/AHA recommendations could be useful in our population but with some overtreatment in women. © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs