Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
High-Protein Diets During Either Resistance or Concurrent Training Have No Detrimental Effect on Bone Parameters in Resistance-Trained Males Publisher Pubmed



Bagheri R1 ; Karimi Z2 ; Mousavi Z3 ; Ziaee Bashirzad M4 ; Camera DM5 ; Sadeghi R6 ; Dabbagh VR6 ; Kargarfard M1 ; Dutheil F7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, 8174673441, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, 1477893855, Iran
  3. 3. Nutrition and Food Service, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 1416634793, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Sport Science, Islamic Azad University, Bojnourd Branch, Bojnourd, 9417697796, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Health and Biostatistics, Swinburne University, Melbourne, 3122, VIC, Australia
  6. 6. Nuclear Medicine Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, 9177949025, Iran
  7. 7. Universite Clermont Auvergne, CNRS, LaPSCo, Physiological and Psychosocial Stress, CHU Clermont-Ferrand, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Preventive and Occupational Medicine, Witty Fit, Clermont-Ferrand, F-63000, France

Source: Nutrients Published:2024


Abstract

Background: The effects of combining resistance training (RT) and concurrent training (CT; resistance + endurance training) with varied protein doses on bone measures remain poorly understood. Hence, we conducted a comparison of the impacts of two high-protein diets (1.6 or 3.2 g kg−1 d−1) over 16 weeks in resistance-trained males, either with CT or RT alone. Methods: A total of forty-eight males, all of whom were resistance-trained, had the following demographics: 26.6 ± 6 years, body mass index: 25.6 ± 2.9 kg m−2 administered either 3.2 g kg−1 d−1 protein (CT2; n = 12; RT2; n = 12) or 1.6 g kg−1 d−1 protein (CT1; n = 12; RT1; n = 12) during 16 weeks (four sessions·w−1). Bone parameters were assessed pre- and post-intervention. Results: There was no significant interaction between the intervention group and time for the legs, arms, ribs, or pelvis area BMC and BMD (p > 0.05). For the BMD of the pelvis and the BMC of the right ribs, however, there were significant time effects noted (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there was a significant interaction between the intervention group and time in the lumbar and thoracic spines, with a particular time effect noted for the thoracic spine region (p < 0.05). The regional differences in skeletal responses to the intervention are highlighted by these data. Conclusion: Our findings show that the intake of two high-protein diets combined with RT and CT during 16 weeks had no adverse effects on bone tissue parameters. While these findings indicate that protein intake between 2 and 3 times the current RDI does not promote bone demineralization when consumed in conjunction with exercise, future studies investigating the long-term effects of chronic high protein intake on bone tissue health are warranted. © 2024 by the authors.