Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Effects of Weight Loss Approaches on Bone Mineral Density in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Publisher Pubmed



Soltani S1 ; Hunter GR2 ; Kazemi A3 ; Shabbidar S3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Hemaat Highway, Tehran, 1449614535, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Human Studies School of Education, University of Alabama at Birmingham, EB 205 1720 2nd Ave South, Birmingham, 34294-1250, AL, United States
  3. 3. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, P. O. Box 14155/6117, Amir Abad, Keshavarz Boulevard, Tehran, Iran

Source: Osteoporosis International Published:2016


Abstract

Summary: We assessed the impact of weight loss strategies including calorie restriction and exercise training on BMD in adults using a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Weight reduction results in reduced BMD at the hip, but has less effect on the spine. Both calorie restriction and a combination of calorie restriction and exercise result in a decrease in hip bone density, whereas weight loss response to exercise training without dietary restriction leads to increased hip BMD. Introduction: Findings are not consistent on the effect of weight loss on bone mineral density (BMD). We conducted a systematic review on the randomized controlled trials to assess the effect of weight loss strategies, including calorie restriction and exercise programs on BMD in adults. Methods: A structured and comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was undertaken up to March 2016. Study-specific mean differences (MD) were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were used to find possible sources of between-study heterogeneity. Results: Thirty-two randomized controlled trials met predetermined inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis revealed no significant difference on total BMD (MD 0.007, 95 % CI −0.020–0.034, p = 0.608). In contrast, the pooled data of studies showed a significant effect of weight loss on hip BMD (MD −0.008, 95 % CI −0.09 to −0.006 g/cm2, p < 0.001) and also lumbar spine BMD (MD −0.018 g/cm2, 95 % CI −0.019 to −0.017, p < 0.001). BMD in the hip site decreased after more than 4 months, especially in those who were obese. Moreover, calorie restriction interventions longer than 13 months showed a significant decreased in lumbar spine BMD. Conclusion: Weight loss led to significant decreases at the hip and lumbar spine BMD but not at the total. Weight loss response following calorie restriction resulted in a decrease in hip and lumbar spine bone density especially more than 1 year; whereas an exercise-induced weight loss did not. © 2016, International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs