Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Zygomatic Implants Placed in Atrophic Maxilla: An Overview of Current Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Ramezanzade S1 ; Yates J2 ; Tuminelli FJ3 ; Keyhan SO4, 5 ; Yousefi P6 ; Lopezlopez J7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
  3. 3. Department of Dental Medicine, Hofstra Northwell School of Medicine, New York, United States
  4. 4. Maxillofacial Surgery and Implantology Research Foundation., Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Craniomaxillofacial Research Center for Craniofacial Reconstruction, Tehran University of Medical Science, Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Prosthodontics, Dental College, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Odontostomatology, School of Dentistry & Dental Hospital Barcelona University, University of Barcelona, Feixa Llarga, s/n – L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, 08907, Spain

Source: Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Zygomatic implants are a treatment option for severely atrophic maxilla. Main text: This study aimed to summarize and evaluate systematic reviews assessing the clinical outcomes of zygomatic implants including survival/failure rate and complications. PubMed-MEDLINE, Google Scholar, LILACS, and the Cochrane Database were searched up to April 2020. Risk of bias assessment was conducted by the AMSTAR tool. Initial searches yielded 175 studies. These were assessed, and following title abstract and full-text evaluation, 7 studies (2 meta-analyses) were included in the final review. According to the AMSTAR tool, 1 was deemed high quality, 4 were classified as medium, and 2 as low quality. The mean AMSTAR score (±SD) was 5.28 of 9 (±2.36) ranging from 2/9 to 9/9. The reported survival rates ranged from 95.2 to 100% except for resected maxillas, which established higher failure rates up to 21.43%. Concerning the complications with the zygomatic implants, various surgical and prosthetic complications were reported with sinusitis being the most frequently observed complication. Zygomatic implants appears to offer a promising alternative to formal bone grafting techniques with lower costs, less complications, less morbidity, shorter treatment times, and comparably high survival rates. Conclusion: Complications were rare and usually easy to manage. However, the treatment should be directed by appropriately trained clinicians with noticeable surgical experience. © 2020, The Author(s).
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs