Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A New Postural Stability-Indicator to Predict the Level of Fear of Falling in Parkinson's Disease Patients Publisher Pubmed



Pourghayoomi E1 ; Behzadipour S2 ; Ramezani M1 ; Joghataei MT1, 3 ; Shahidi GA4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neuroscience, Faculty of Advanced Technologies in Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Mechanical Engineering Department, And Cross Appointed with Djawad Movafaghian Research Center in Neuro-rehabilitation Technologies, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Cellular and Molecular Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Movement Disorders Clinic, Hazrat Rasool Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: BioMedical Engineering Online Published:2020


Abstract

Background: Fear of falling (FoF) is defined as a lasting concern about falling that causes a person to limit or even stop the daily activities that he/she is capable of. Seventy percent of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients report activity limitations due to FoF. Timely identification of FoF is critical to prevent its additional adverse effects on the quality of life. Self-report questionnaires are commonly used to evaluate the FoF, which may be prone to human error. Objectives: In this study, we attempted to identify a new postural stability-indicator to objectively predict the intensity of FoF and its related behavior(s) in PD patients. Methods: Thirty-eight PD patients participated in the study (mean age, 61.2 years), among whom 10 (26.32%) were identified with low FoF and the rest (73.68%) with high FoF, based on Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). We used a limit of stability task calibrated to each individual and investigated the postural strategies to predict the intensity of FoF. New parameters (FTR i s; functional time ratio) were extracted based on the center of pressure presence pattern in different rectangular areas (i = 1, 2, and 3). The task was performed on two heights to investigate FoF-related behavior(s). Results: FTR 1/2 (the ratio between FTR 1 and FTR 2) was strongly correlated with the FES-I (r =-0.63, p < 0.001), Pull test (r =-0.65, p < 0.001), Timed Up and Go test (r =-0.57, p < 0.001), and Berg Balance Scale (r = 0.62, p < 0.001). The model of FTR 1/2 was identified as a best-fitting model to predicting the intensity of FoF in PD participants (sensitivity = 96.43%, specificity = 80%), using a threshold level of ≤ 2.83. Conclusions: Using the proposed assessment technique, we can accurately predict the intensity of FoF in PD patients. Also, the FTR 1/2 index can be potentially considered as a mechanical biomarker to sense the FoF-related postural instability in PD patients. © 2020 The Author(s).