Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization Versus Conventional Management for Patients With Chronic Subdural Hematoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Sattari SA1 ; Yang W1 ; Shahbandi A2 ; Feghali J1 ; Lee RP1 ; Xu R1 ; Jackson C1 ; Gonzalez LF1 ; Tamargo RJ1 ; Huang J1 ; Caplan JM1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
  2. 2. Tehran School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran

Source: Neurosurgery Published:2023


Abstract

BACKGROUND: The results from studies that compare middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization vs conventional management for patients with chronic subdural hematoma are varied. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis on studies that compared MMA embolization vs conventional management. METHODS: Medline, PubMed, and Embase databases were searched. Primary outcomes were treatment failure and surgical rescue; secondary outcomes were complications, follow-up modified Rankin scale > 2, mortality, complete hematoma resolution, and length of hospital stay (day). The certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Nine studies yielding 1523 patients were enrolled, of which 337 (22.2%) and 1186 (77.8%) patients received MMA embolization and conventional management, respectively. MMA embolization was superior to conventional management for treatment failure (relative risk [RR] = 0.34 [0.14-0.82], P = .02), surgical rescue (RR = 0.33 [0.14-0.77], P = .01), and complete hematoma resolution (RR = 2.01 [1.10-3.68], P = .02). There was no difference between the 2 groups for complications (RR = 0.93 [0.63-1.37], P = .72), follow-up modified Rankin scale >2 (RR = 0.78 [0.449-1.25], P = .31), mortality (RR = 1.05 [0.51-2.14], P = .89), and length of hospital stay (mean difference = —0.57 [—2.55, 1.41], P = .57). For MMA embolization, the number needed to treat for treatment failure, surgical rescue, and complete hematoma resolution was 7, 9, and 3, respectively. The certainty of the evidence was moderate to high for primary outcomes and low to moderate for secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: MMA embolization decreases treatment failure and the need for surgical rescue without furthering the risk of morbidity and mortality. The authors recommend considering MMA embolization in the chronic subdural hematoma management. © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2023. All rights reserved.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
32. Low-Dose Whole Lung Irradiation for Treatment of Covid-19 Pneumonia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics (2022)