Validation Study of the Persian Version of Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer’S Disease Rating Scale (Behave-Ad) and the Empirical Bhave-Ad (E-Behave-Ad) Publisher



Noroozian M¹ ; Vahabi Z^{2, 3} ; Hooshyari Z³ ; Etesam F^{3, 4} ; Tarighatnia H² Show Affiliations
Source: Applied Neuropsychology:Adult Published:2023

Abstract

Introduction: Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD) are observed in more than 90% of patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). BPSDs are remediable if detected early and managed appropriately. Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer’s disease Rating Scale (BEHAVE-AD) and Empirical BEHAVE-AD (E-BEHAVE-AD) were designed to identify BPSD. The aim of this study is to validate and prepare BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD in Persian language for clinical and research applications. Method: 120 patients were selected through a combination of intentional and convenience sampling. All participants should fulfill the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group criteria for a clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Functional Assessment Staging Tool (FAST) was used to determine the rate of AD progression. All patients were evaluated using the BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD questionnaires, as well as the Persian version of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). The Content Validity Index (CVI) is determined based on the compatibility of the Persian and the original version of the two scales according to the opinion of expert panels. Correlation of MMSE with BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD as well as the BPSD pattern on AD progression continuum by FAST were considered as indices of construct validity. Concurrent validity was estimated by correlating NPI-Q scores with BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores. For both scales, interrater reliability was extracted as a reliability index. Results: Pearson correlation coefficients for the BEHAVE-AD scale were as follows: with NPI-Q (r = 0.77, p-value <0.01), with MMSE (r = −0.34, p-value <0.01), indicating concurrent and construct validity, respectively. The result for E-BEHAVE-AD was as follows: with NPI-Q-total (r = 0.59, p-value <0.01), and with MMSE (r = 0.31, p-value <0. 01). BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores increased in parallel with AD severity according to FAST, but not on the most severe AD stage. The area under the curve was estimated to be 0.84 (p-value <0.001) for BEHAVE-AD and 0.78 (p-value <0.001) for E-BEHAVE-AD. Correlation between BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD scores ranged from 0.45 to 0.63. The inter-rater reliability index ranged from 0.88 to 0.99 for BEHAVE-AD and from 0.74 to 0.95 for E-BEHAVE-AD. Conclusions: The Persian version of BEHAVE-AD and E-BEHAVE-AD is valid and reliable for the assessment of BPSD in patients with AD. © 2023 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.