Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Prevalence of Physical Activity Using Validated Tools Among Adults During the Covid-19 Pandemic in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Publisher



Albelbeisi AH1, 2 ; Arabzozani M3 ; Nemati MK4 ; Shaqfa KM5 ; Kakemam E6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences–International Campus (TUMS-IC), Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Medical Services Directorate, Gaza Strip, Palestine
  3. 3. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Birjand University of Medical Sciences, Birjand, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Health Management, Faculty of Management and Medical Information, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. General Directorate of Nursing, Palestinian Ministry of Health, Gaza Strip, Palestine
  6. 6. Clinical Research Development Unit of Tabriz Valiasr Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

Source: SAGE Open Medicine Published:2022


Abstract

Many interventions have been taken around the world to limit the spread of COVID-19. These interventions have affected people’s lifestyles such as physical activity. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the prevalence of physical activity using validated tools among adults during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Eastern Mediterranean region. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were conducted in October 2021. We searched three electronic databases (Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed) for English-language original articles of observational studies (cross-sectional, case–control, and cohort studies) with original data reporting the prevalence of physical activity among adults in 22 countries from EMR during the COVID-19 pandemic. Hoy’s risk of Bias tool was applied to assess the biases in individual studies. The result was reported as a percentage for prevalence. A meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effect model with a 95% confidence interval. A total of 363 articles were retrieved. Finally, 15 articles were selected and included in the statistical analysis. The selected studies included 16,585 participants. The result of the meta-analysis showed that the overall physical activity was 51.6% (95% confidence interval: 42.1, 61: p = 0.745). The result of subgroup analysis based on different tools was 60.2%, 39.5%, 36.3%, 39.4%, and 55.2% for Global Physical Activity Questionnaire, The Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire–BREF, and International Physical Activity Questionnaire–short form, respectively. Our study highlights the urgent need for large-scale measurement and reporting of physical activity and the use of standard tools that can allow for the regular assessment and screening of the PA prevalence to support evidence-informed policy and programs development at both national and regional levels. © The Author(s) 2022.