Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Effect of Intermittent Fasting Diet in Comparison With Low-Calorie Diet on Inflammation, Lipid Profile, Glycemic Index, Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (Mafld): A Randomized Controlled Trial Publisher Pubmed



Karimi M1 ; Akhgarjand C1 ; Houjaghani H2 ; Nejad MM3 ; Sohrabpour AA4 ; Poustchi H5 ; Mohammadi H1 ; Chamari M3 ; Imani H1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Faculty of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences (IUMS), Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutritional Sciences and Dietetics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Tehran Gastroenterology and Hepatology Centre (Masoud Clinic), Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Liver and Pancreatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Clinical Therapeutics Published:2025


Abstract

Background: Metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a prevalent condition with significant health and economic burdens. Dietary interventions, such as intermittent fasting (IF) and low-calorie diets (LCD), have shown promise in managing MAFLD, but their comparative efficacy remains unclear. Methods: This 10-month, parallel, single-blind randomized controlled trial compared the effects of a 16:8 IF diet with an LCD on 52 patients with MAFLD. Anthropometric, biochemical, liver enzyme, steatosis, fibrosis, inflammatory, and oxidative status parameters were assessed before and after the interventions. Results: Both diets led to improvements in anthropometric measures and liver enzyme levels, with no significant differences between groups. However, the LCD group showed superior outcomes in reducing liver steatosis (–52.40 vs –44.63 dB/m; P < 0.001) and fibrosis (–0.74 vs –0.004 Kpa; P = 0.01) compared to the IF group. LCD also led to a significant decrease in serum triglycerides (–24.08 vs 11.22 mg/dL; P = 0.02), while neither intervention significantly affected inflammatory markers or oxidative status. Conclusion: While both IF and LCD can be effective in managing MAFLD, LCD may offer additional benefits in terms of liver fat reduction and improvement in certain lipid parameters. These findings highlight the complexity of dietary interventions in MAFLD and the need for personalized approaches. © 2025 Elsevier Inc.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs