Comparison of Hand-Sewn Anterior Repair, Resection and Hand-Sewn Anastomosis, Resection and Stapled Anastomosis Techniques for the Reversal of Diverting Loop Ileostomy After Low Anterior Rectal Resection: A Randomized Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Meshkati Yazd SM¹ ; Shahriarirad R^{2, 3} ; Keramati MR^{1, 4} ; Fallahi M^{3, 5} ; Nourmohammadi SS^{3, 6} ; Kazemeini A^{1, 4} ; Fazeli MS^{1, 4} ; Keshvari A^{1, 4} Show Affiliations
Source: Techniques in Coloproctology Published:2024

Abstract

Background: Low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer may require a defunctioning loop ileostomy formation that requires closure after a period of time. There are three common techniques for ileostomy closure: anterior repair (AR or fold-over closure), resection and hand-sewn anastomosis (RHA), and resection and stapled anastomosis (RSA). We aimed to compare them on the basis of operative and postoperative features. Methods: Patients with rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection without complications were included in this study and randomly assigned to three parallel groups to undergo loop ileostomy closure via either AR, RHA, or RSA. Early and late outcomes were gathered from all included patients. Results: Among 93 patients with a mean age of 56.21 ± 11.78 years, consisting of 58 (62.4%) men, 31 patients underwent AR, 30 patients RHA, and 32 patients RSA. There was no significant difference among the groups regarding the frequency and location of intraoperative injuries (P = 0.157). The AR groups demonstrated significantly less consumption of gauzes following intraoperative bleeding compared to the two others groups. The results showed that the duration of surgery in the RSA was significantly shorter than in the AR or RHA group (both P < 0.001). Regarding postoperative course, only one case of hematoma and two cases of surgical wound infection occurred in the RHA group. Anastomotic leakage and complete or partial obstruction did not occur in any group of patients. Latent postoperative complications did not occur in any group of patients. The median time between surgery and discharge as well as the interval until first gas passage, first defecation, oral tolerated liquid diet, as well as oral tolerated soft and regular diet in the AR group were significantly lower than in the two other groups (both P < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in these intervals between the RHA and RSA groups. Conclusions: Resection and stapled anastomosis had the shortest duration among the three techniques; however, anterior repair had faster recovery, including earlier tolerated oral diet, gas passing and defecation, and discharge, in comparison with the other techniques. Trial registration: Trial registration number IRCT20120129008861N5. © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2024.