Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Pharmacoeconomic Evaluation of Insulin Aspart and Glargine in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iran Publisher



Nosrati M1 ; Ahmadi Fariman S1 ; Saiyarsarai P1 ; Nikfar S1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 16 Azar St., Enghelab-E Islami Sq, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders Published:2023


Abstract

Purpose: The higher costs of insulin analogs including short-acting insulin aspart (IAsp) and long-acting insulin glargine (IGla) have restricted their widespread uptake despite having improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and patient convenience. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of IAsp versus Regular Insulin (RI) and IGla versus NPH Insulin in type 1 and 2 diabetes from the perspective of the Iranian healthcare system. Methods: Clinical data including HbA1c levels, hypoglycemia, weight gain, and health-related quality of life were derived from the included systematic review and meta-analysis studies. Different methods of pharmacoeconomic evaluation were used for an annual time horizon. Utility decrements for diabetes-related complications were extracted from the literature. Direct medical costs were calculated in 2022 prices. A one-way sensitivity analysis was also performed. Results: In type 1 diabetes, IAsp was associated with more costs and effects in terms of reducing HbA1c compared with RI. An incremental cost of $83 was estimated to obtain an additional 1% reduction in HbA1c per patient per year. Similarly, an incremental cost of $16 was estimated for IGla compared with NPH. In type 2 diabetes, IAsp and RI were associated with equal efficacy and safety. For IGla versus NPH, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated at $1975 per quality-adjusted life-year. The robustness of the result was confirmed through sensitivity analysis. Conclusion: Insulin analogs, IAsp and IGla, are cost-effective for type 1 diabetes versus human insulins, RI and NPH. For type 2 diabetes, IAsp is not cost-effective when compared with RI. For IGla versus NPH, however, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio seems to be within the accepted thresholds. © 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
Other Related Docs
14. A New Model for Optimization of Diabetes Clinics With the Case Study in Iran, Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders (2022)
17. Policy Implications for Diabetes Prevention and Control: An Experience From Iran, Medical Journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran (2022)
24. The Persian Guilan Cohort Study (Pgcs), Archives of Iranian Medicine (2019)
41. Knowledge Discovery in Genetics of Diabetes in Iran, a Roadmap for Future Researches, Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders (2021)
42. A Multidisciplinary Team Approach in Iranian Diabetic Foot Research Group, Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders (2019)