Agreement Between Pentacam and Handheld Auto-Refractor/Keratometer for Keratometry Measurement; [Concordancia Entre El Sistema Pentacam Y Un Auto-Refractometro/Queratometro Portatil Para La Medicion De Queratometria] Publisher Pubmed



Hashemi H¹ ; Heydarian S² ; Ali Yekta A³ ; Aghamirsalim M⁴ ; Ahmadipishkuhi M¹ ; Valadkhan M¹ ; Ostadimoghaddam H⁵ ; Amiri AA⁶ ; Khabazkhoob M⁷
Source: Journal of Optometry Published:2019

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the level of agreement in keratometry measurements between a rotating Scheimpflug imaging-based system (Pentacam) and a handheld auto-refractokeratometer (handheld NIDEK ARK-30). Method: This analytical cross-sectional study was conducted in the right eyes of 579 subjects. Keratometry measurements were conducted with the Pentacam and the handheld NIDEK ARK-30 systems. The SPSS Software version 22 and MedCalc V3 were applied to estimate descriptive statistics using paired t-test, Pearson correlation coefficient, 95% limits of agreement (LoA), and Bland–Altman plot. Results: In the total sample, the inter-device difference in the mean flat and steep keratometry values was −0.266 diopter (D) (P-value < 0.001) and 0.052 D (P-value = 0.093), respectively. There was a significant difference in mean flat keratometry between the two devices in all groups of refractive errors (paired difference <0.5 D and P-value < 0.001). The difference in mean steep keratometry was significant only in myopic subjects (P-value = 0.046). The 95% LoA between the two devices measurements was 2.51 D, 3.98 D, and 6.37 D for flat keratometry and 2.6 D, 3.2 D, and 3.9 D for steep keratometry in emmetropic, myopic, and hyperopic subjects, respectively. Conclusion: Our study showed relatively wide limits of agreement between handheld NIDEK ARK-30 and Pentacam; therefore, these devices cannot be used interchangeably for measuring corneal curvature. © 2019 Spanish General Council of Optometry