Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Corneal Layer Thickness in Keratoconus Using Optical Coherence Tomography Publisher Pubmed



Heidari Z1, 2 ; Mohammadpour M2, 3 ; Hajizadeh F2 ; Fotouhi A4 ; Hashemi H2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Bu-Ali Sina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran
  2. 2. Noor Ophthalmology Research Center, Noor Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Farabi Eye Hospital and Eye Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Clinical and Experimental Optometry Published:2024


Abstract

Clinical relevance: Accurate thickness measurement of corneal layers using anterior segment OCT can be used to improve visual outcomes. Understanding its applications is essential for optometric practices to enhance eye care procedures. Background: To evaluate the thicknesses of different corneal layers for identifying keratoconus (KCN) and subclinical keratoconus (SKCN) using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: This prospective study analyzed 60 eyes with KCN, 48 eyes with SKCN, and 53 normal eyes. The central corneal thickness (CCT) and thicknesses of the epithelium, Bowman, stroma, and Descemet-endothelium layers were measured using SD-OCT. One way analysis of variance and the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the parameters. The Delong method was used to compare AUCs. Results: In KCN, CCT and thicknesses of epithelium, Bowman, stroma, and Descemet-endothelium layers were 495.5 ± 41.7, 52.6 ± 6.4,11.5 ± 1.4, 415.5 ± 38.9, and 12.3 ± 1.7 µm, respectively. These thickness values were respectively 524.5 ± 33.3, 56.8 ± 6.8, 11.5 ± 1.6, 439.8 ± 30.6, and 12.4 ± 1.7 µm in SKCN and 563.8 ± 37.9, 57.7 ± 6.9, 12.2 ± 1.6, 469.5 ± 33.7, and 12.8 ± 2.1µm in normal group. Total cornea and stroma in KCN and SKCN, and epithelium in KCN were significantly thinner compared to the normal group (P < 0.001). The highest AUC values were observed for CCT in KCN (AUC 0.90) and SKCN (AUC 0.782). The diagnostic accuracy was significantly higher for stromal thickness in KCN (sensitivity 81.7%, specificity 73.6%, AUC 0.871) and SKCN (sensitivity 80.0%, specificity 56.6%, AUC 0.751) than other individual corneal layers (Delong, P < 0.001). Conclusion: CCT can accurately distinguish keratoconus from normal eyes. However, central corneal stromal thinning was the most sensitive diagnostic index for early detection of SKCN. Developing standardized stromal maps may be helpful for detecting SKCN. © 2023 Optometry Australia.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
10. Can Oct Pachymetry Identify Keratoconus Suspects?, Iranian Journal of Ophthalmology (2015)
11. Pentacam, Diagnostics in Ocular Imaging: Cornea# Retina# Glaucoma and Orbit (2020)