Analysis and Prioritization of Indicators for Measuring and Evaluating Science, Technology, and Innovation in the Field of Dentistry; [یواکاوویدنبتيولواهصخاشایشجنسوايزرابی،ملعیروانفویروآونردیهزوحیکشزپنادند] Publisher



Zareian M ; Fahimifar S ; Eltemasi M
Source: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Published:2026

Abstract

Background: Performance assessment in dentistry requires specialized frameworks that go beyond traditional scientometric indicators to focus on innovation, knowledge transfer, and systematic infrastructure. However, the lack of validated frameworks, especially in developing countries, is considered a significant research gap. This study aimed to develop a comprehensive framework for assessing science, technology, and innovation in dentistry. Methods: This research was conducted with a combined approach (qualitative-quantitative) and mixed method. In the first stage, using the meta-synthesis method, 198 primary indicators were extracted from the analysis of 60 domestic and foreign scientific sources and categorized into 8 main components and 59 sub-components. In the second stage, for localization and validation, the Delphi method was used with the participation of 15 experienced experts in the field of dentistry. The Delphi process was conducted in three rounds and the final indicators were determined based on the mean score, standard deviation, and Kendall's coefficient of concordance. Findings: After the Delphi process, 10 key indicators were identified in four main categories: 1) Scientific h-index and g-index of dentistry, number of international collaborations, 2) Technology indicators, 3) Innovation indicators, 4) Structural-evaluation indicators. The h-index of dentistry had the highest importance and agreement with a mean of 4.6 and a Kendall's coefficient of concordance of 0.82. Conclusion: The findings of this study showed that evaluation in dentistry requires a multidimensional framework that, in addition to knowledge production, also considers technological, innovative, and structural dimensions. The proposed framework can be used as a valid tool in evaluation. © 2026, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences(IUMS). All rights reserved.