Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Evaluation of Reproductive Health Phd Program in Iran: The Input Indicators Analysis



Abdishahshahani M1 ; Ehsanpour S2 ; Yamani N2 ; Kohan S3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Midwifery, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research Published:2014

Abstract

Background: Appropriate quality achievement of a PhD program requires frequent assessment and discovering the shortcomings in the program. Inputs, which are important elements of the curriculum, are frequently missed in evaluations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the input indicators of reproductive health PhD program in Iran based on the Context, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) evaluation model. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive and evaluative study based on the CIPP evaluation model. It was conducted in 2013 in four Iranian schools of nursing and midwifery of medical sciences universities. Statistical population consisted of four groups: heads of departments (n = 5), faculty members (n = 18), graduates (n = 12), and PhD students of reproductive health (n = 54). Data collection tools were five separate questionnaires including 37 indicators that were developed by the researcher. Content and face validity were evaluated based on the experts' indications. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was calculated in order to obtain the reliability of the questionnaires. Collected data were analyzed by SPSS software. Data were analyzed by descriptive statistics (mean, frequency, percentage, and standard deviation), and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests to compare means between groups. Results: The results of the study indicated that the highest percentage of the heads of departments (80%), graduates (66.7%), and students (68.5%) evaluated the status of input indicators of reproductive health PhD program as relatively appropriate, while most of the faculties (66.7%) evaluated that as appropriate. Conclusions: It is suggested to explore the reasons for relatively appropriate evaluation of input indicators by further academic researches and improve the reproductive health PhD program accordingly. © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications. All rights reserved.
7. Psychometric Properties of Childbearing Questionnaire in Iranian Men and Women, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (2023)
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
18. Implementation of Targeted Education to Promote Normal Vaginal Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (2018)
23. Efficacy of Communication Skills Training Workshop on Sexual Function in Infertile Women, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2015)
26. Generation-Dependent Non-Educational Characteristics of Medical Students, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2022)
36. Developing a Generic Model of Program Accreditation in Iran, Journal of Education and Health Promotion (2023)
47. Determining the Expected Competencies for Oncology Nursing: A Needs Assessment Study, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2018)
50. Validation of the Persian Version of the Mobile Application Rating Scale (Mars) in the Field of Pregnancy, Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility (2024)