Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
A Scoping Literature Review of the Provision of Orthoses and Prostheses in Resourcelimited Environments 2000-2010. Part One: Considerations for Success Publisher Pubmed



Ikeda AJ1 ; Grabowski AM2 ; Lindsley A1 ; Sadeghidemneh E3 ; Reisinger KD1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Whirlwind Wheelchair International, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA 94132-4163, 1600 Holloway Avenue, United States
  2. 2. Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, United States
  3. 3. Musculoskeletal Research Center, Orthotics and Prosthetics Department, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Prosthetics and Orthotics International Published:2014


Abstract

Study Design: Literature Review Background: We estimate that over 29 million people worldwide in resource-limited environments (RLEs) are in need of orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) devices and services. Objectives: Our goal was to ascertain the current state of O&P provision in RLEs and identify factors that may lead to more successful O&P provision. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive scoping literature review of all information related to O&P provision in RLEs published from 2000 to 2010. We targeted Vietnam, Cambodia, Tanzania, Malawi, Colombia, and the Navajo Nation, but also included information about developing countries in general. We searched academic databases and grey literature. We extracted information from each article in the areas of design, manufacturing, distribution, service provision, and technology transfer. Results: We identified commonly reported considerations and strategies for O&P provision from 431 articles. Analysis of expert consensus documents revealed recurring themes for improving O&P provision. We found that some suggestions from the consensus documents are being followed, but many are overlooked or have not yet been implemented. Conclusions: Areas for improvement include conducting field testing during the design process, providing services to rural environments, offering follow-up services, considering government collaboration, and encouraging an active role of the orthosis/prosthesis user. Outcomes and research studies will be further discussed in Part Two. © The International Society for Prosthetics and Orthotics 2013.