Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Effect of Cleaning Methods on Retentive Values of Saliva-Contaminated Implant-Supported Zirconia Copings Publisher Pubmed



Nejatidanesh F1, 2 ; Savabi O3 ; Savabi G1 ; Razavi M4
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  3. 3. Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States

Source: Clinical Oral Implants Research Published:2018


Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different cleaning regimens on retentive strength of saliva-contaminated implant-supported zirconia copings. Material and Methods: Seventy solid titanium abutments with 5.5 mm height (Straumann) were attached to the regular neck implant analogs (Straumann). The abutment-analog complex was mounted vertically in an autopolymerized T-shaped acrylic resin block. Seventy zirconia copings with an occlusal loop were made. The copings were contaminated with fresh human saliva for 1 min (except the control group). Afterward, the specimens were washed with water spray for 15 s and dried for 15 s. The copings were divided into seven groups according to cleaning methods (n = 10). Group 1: no contamination (control group); Group 2: water spray rinsing; Group 3: airborne particle abrasion; Group 4: immersion in 96% isopropanol; Group 5: applying Ivoclean (Ivoclar Vivadent); Group 6: applying 1% sodium hypochlorite; and Group 7: applying Monobond Plus (Ivoclar Vivadent). The copings were luted with a resin luting agent (RelyX Unicem; 3M ESPE). After 5,000 thermal cycles, the retentive values of the restorations were tested using universal testing machine. The dislodging forces were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and the Tukey's HSD tests (α = 0.05). Results: The copings, which were cleaned with Ivoclean and 96% isopropanol, showed the highest retentive values (204.79 ± 44.49 and 232.65 ± 71.36, respectively). There was a significant difference between the studied groups (F = 2.735; p =.02). Tukey's HSD showed that there was no significant difference between the different cleaning procedures and control group except water rinsing group (p =.14). The lowest retentive value was related to the saliva-contaminated group, which were only cleaned with water rinsing method. Conclusion: The retentive values of zirconia-based restorations were adversely affected by saliva contaminations. These restorations can be cleaned by Ivoclean, 96% isopropanol, airborne particle abrasion, 1% sodium hypochlorite, or applying Monobond Plus before luting procedures. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd
Other Related Docs
14. Risk of Contamination of Different Areas of Dentist's Face During Dental Practices, International Journal of Preventive Medicine (2013)
16. Accuracy of Tooth-Implant Impressions: Comparison of Five Different Techniques, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2023)
26. Adhesion to Zirconia: An Umbrella Review, International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives (2023)
35. An in Vitro Evaluation of Novel Nha/Zircon Plasma Coating on 316L Stainless Steel Dental Implant, Progress in Natural Science: Materials International (2014)
38. Effect of Different Chemical Disinfectants on the Flexural Strength of Heat-Polymerized Acrylic Resins, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry (2013)
40. Effect of Implants on Maximum Bite Force in Edentulous Patients., The Journal of oral implantology (2009)