Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Normal Saline Versus Hypertonic 3% Saline: It's Efficacy in Non-Acute Rhinosinusitis



Berjis N1 ; Sonbolastan SM1 ; Okhovat SH1 ; Narimani AA1 ; Razmjui J2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Published:2011

Abstract

Introduction: Sinusitis is one of the most common diseases in general and in otolaryngology practice, but the optimal therapeutic options have not yet been fully developed. This manuscript will try to compare normal saline nasal douching with hypertonic saline in reducing symptoms and improving its signs. Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen patients suffering from non acute rhinosinusitis, documented by history, physical examination and radiologic studies were divided into normal saline and hypertonic saline groups, each consisting of 57 patients. data were obtained by physical examination and a questionnaire.. Results: Type of treatment had no significant effect on headache, morning dryness of mouth and pharynx and fatigue. Nontheless, nasal congestion, purulent discharge and postnasal discharge were reported to have improved in the group treated with hypertonic saline versus the normal saline group. Patient satisfaction also showed better scores in the hypertonic saline group. Conclusion: Hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective for nasal irrigation than normal saline in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
17. The Effect of Maxillary Multidirectional Movement on Nasal Respiration, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (2009)