Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Disability Accrual in Primary and Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Publisher Pubmed



Hardingforrester S1 ; Roos I1, 2 ; Nguyen AL1, 2 ; Malpas CB1, 2 ; Diouf I1, 2 ; Moradi N1, 2 ; Sharmin S1, 2 ; Izquierdo G3 ; Eichau S3 ; Patti F4 ; Horakova D5 ; Kubala Havrdova E5 ; Prat A6, 7 ; Girard M6, 8 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Hardingforrester S1
  2. Roos I1, 2
  3. Nguyen AL1, 2
  4. Malpas CB1, 2
  5. Diouf I1, 2
  6. Moradi N1, 2
  7. Sharmin S1, 2
  8. Izquierdo G3
  9. Eichau S3
  10. Patti F4
  11. Horakova D5
  12. Kubala Havrdova E5
  13. Prat A6, 7
  14. Girard M6, 8
  15. Duquette P6, 8
  16. Grandmaison F9
  17. Onofrj M10
  18. Lugaresi A11, 12
  19. Grammond P13
  20. Ozakbas S14
  21. Amato MP15, 16
  22. Gerlach O17
  23. Sola P18
  24. Ferraro D19, 20
  25. Buzzard K21
  26. Skibina O21
  27. Lechnerscott J22, 23
  28. Alroughani R24
  29. Boz C25
  30. Van Pesch V26
  31. Cartechini E27
  32. Terzi M28
  33. Maimone D29
  34. Ramotello C30
  35. Yamout B31, 32
  36. Khoury SJ31, 33
  37. La Spitaleri D34
  38. Sa MJ35, 36
  39. Blanco Y37
  40. Granella F38
  41. Slee M39
  42. Butler E40
  43. Sidhom Y41
  44. Gouider R42
  45. Bergamaschi R43
  46. Karabudak R44
  47. Ampapa R45
  48. Sanchezmenoyo JL46
  49. Prevost J47
  50. Castillotrivino T48
  51. Mccombe PA49
  52. Macdonell R50
  53. Laureys G51
  54. Van Hijfte L51
  55. Oh J52
  56. Altintas A53, 54
  57. De Gans K55
  58. Turkoglu R56
  59. Van Der Walt A57
  60. Butzkueven H58, 59
  61. Vucic S60
  62. Barnett M61
  63. Cristiano E62
  64. Hodgkinson S63
  65. Iuliano G64
  66. Kappos L65, 66
  67. Kuhle J65, 66
  68. Shaygannejad V67
  69. Soysal A68
  70. Weinstockguttman B69
  71. Van Wijmeersch B70, 71
  72. Kalincik T1, 2

Source: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry Published:2023


Abstract

Background Some studies comparing primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS, SPMS) report similar ages at onset of the progressive phase and similar rates of subsequent disability accrual. Others report later onset and/or faster accrual in SPMS. Comparisons have been complicated by regional cohort effects, phenotypic differences in sex ratio and management and variable diagnostic criteria for SPMS. Methods We compared disability accrual in PPMS and operationally diagnosed SPMS in the international, clinic-based MSBase cohort. Inclusion required PPMS or SPMS with onset at age ≥18 years since 1995. We estimated Andersen-Gill hazard ratios for disability accrual on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), adjusted for sex, age, baseline disability, EDSS score frequency and drug therapies, with centre and patient as random effects. We also estimated ages at onset of the progressive phase (Kaplan-Meier) and at EDSS milestones (Turnbull). Analyses were replicated with physician-diagnosed SPMS. Results Included patients comprised 1872 with PPMS (47% men; 50% with activity) and 2575 with SPMS (32% men; 40% with activity). Relative to PPMS, SPMS had older age at onset of the progressive phase (median 46.7 years (95% CI 46.2-47.3) vs 43.9 (43.3-44.4); p<0.001), greater baseline disability, slower disability accrual (HR 0.86 (0.78-0.94); p<0.001) and similar age at wheelchair dependence. Conclusions We demonstrate later onset of the progressive phase and slower disability accrual in SPMS versus PPMS. This may balance greater baseline disability in SPMS, yielding convergent disability trajectories across phenotypes. The different rates of disability accrual should be considered before amalgamating PPMS and SPMS in clinical trials. © 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs