Isfahan University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Positive Psychology Interventions for Patients With Heart Disease: A Preliminary Randomized Trial Publisher Pubmed



Nikrahan GR1 ; Suarez L2, 3 ; Asgari K1 ; Beach SR2, 3, 4 ; Celano CM2, 3, 4 ; Kalantari M1 ; Abedi MR5 ; Etesampour A6 ; Abbas R7 ; Huffman JC2, 3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Psychology, Islamic Azad University of Borujen, Borujen, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
  4. 4. Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
  5. 5. Department of Consulting, University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Internal Medicine, Najafabad Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Immunology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran

Source: Psychosomatics Published:2016


Abstract

Background: Positive psychologic characteristics have been linked to superior cardiac outcomes. Objective: Accordingly, in this exploratory study, we assessed positive psychology interventions in patients who had recently undergone a procedure to treat cardiovascular disease. Method: Participants were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 different 6-week face-to-face interventions or a wait-list control condition. We assessed intervention feasibility and compared changes in psychologic outcome measures postintervention (7 wk) and at follow-up (15 wk) between intervention and control participants. Across the interventions, 74% of assigned sessions were completed. Results: When comparing outcomes between interventions and control participants (N = 55 total), there were no between-group differences post-intervention, but at follow-up intervention participants had greater improvements in happiness (β = 14.43, 95% CI: 8.66-20.2, p < 0.001), depression (β = -3.87, 95% CI: -7.72 to 0.02, p = 0.049), and hope (β = 7.12, 95% CI: 1.25-13.00, p =0.017), with moderate-large effect sizes. Efficacy of the 3 interventions was similar. Conclusions: Future studies are needed to identify an optimal positive psychology intervention for cardiac patients. © 2016 The Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine.
Other Related Docs
13. Fordyce Happiness Program and Postpartum Depression, Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (2014)
23. Effect of Hope Therapy on the Mood Status of Patients With Diabetes, Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2018)
40. Myocardial Infarction and Depression, Journal of Isfahan Medical School (2011)