Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
The Effect of Delayed Photobiomodulation Therapy on Inferior Alveolar Nerve Recovery After Third Molar Removal: A Triple-Blinded Randomized Clinical Trial Publisher Pubmed



Yari A1 ; Fasih P2 ; Movahed E3 ; Sarand SH4 ; Goodarzi A5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Materials, School of Dentistry, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Tehran University of Medical Sciences, School of Dentistry-International Campus, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran

Source: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Third molar removal is the primary reason for inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) damage, with 2% causing persistent neurosensory deficits. This study aimed to investigate how delayed photobiomodulation therapy affects long-lasting neurosensory disturbances. Methods: This study was conducted on patients with neurosensory disturbances lasting longer than 6 months. Patients were randomly allocated to the study and control groups, with the study group receiving a low-power diode laser (continuous wavelength of 810 nm, power of 200 mW) on 16 points (30 sec at each) for 12 sessions (2 sessions/week), while the control group received a placebo treatment by switched-off laser probe. Visual analog scale (VAS; ranging from 1 to 5), static light touch, two-point discrimination, direction discrimination, pinprick, and thermal discrimination tests were performed on each visit up to 9 months post-therapy to evaluate the recovery status. Results: Each group comprised 18 participants. The mean time since injury was 8.26 – 2.05 and 8.38 – 1.98 months for the control and intervention groups, respectively (p = 0.81). There was a significant improvement in the intervention group on the static light touch (p = 0.041), two-point discrimination (p = 0.028), VAS (p = 0.031), and pinprick (p = 0.014) tests on the 11th session and subsequent visits and also on direction discrimination test on the 12th session (p = 0.044) and after that. There was no significant difference in the thermal discrimination tests between the two groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Photobiomodulation demonstrated potential benefits in resolving persistent neurosensory deficits of the IAN, with noticeable improvements typically observed after around 35 days of treatment initiation (10 sessions). © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
3. Efficacy, Uses, and Limitations of Photobiomodulation on Damaged Nerves Regeneration in Dentistry, Laser Light Therapy in Dentistry: Efficacy# Uses and Limitations (2021)
Experts (# of related papers)