Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Postoperative Cosmetic Outcome of Intraoperative Radiotherapy in Comparison to Whole Breast Radiotherapy in Early Stage Breast Cancer; a Retrospective Cohort Study Publisher Pubmed



Nafissi N1 ; Meshkati Yazd SM2 ; Shahriarirad R3, 4 ; Zangeneh S5 ; Ghorbani S1 ; Farazmand B6 ; Karoobi M2, 3, 4 ; Mirzaei HR7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Breast, Rasoul Akram Hospital Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC), Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, 01136746911, Iran
  3. 3. Thoracic and Vascular Surgery Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Science, Shiraz, Iran
  4. 4. Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  5. 5. Fasa University of Medical Sciences, Fasa, Iran
  6. 6. Radiation Oncology Research Center, Iran Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Cancer Research Center, Shohadae Tajrish Hospital, Department of Radiation Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: BMC Cancer Published:2023


Abstract

Background: In this study, we aim to evaluate the cosmetic outcome differences between Intraoperative electron beam radiation therapy (IOERT) and whole breast radiotherapy (WBR) with further investigation of boosted IOERT. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in two referral centers in Tehran, Iran. 116 women aged 30 to 79 with early-stage breast cancer (T0-2N0-1M0) eligible for breast conservation were divided into two groups of 58 based on the intervention they received, and further subgroups were defined based on receiving boosted IOERT. Patients in both groups underwent breast conservation surgery and those in the IOERT group received either a 21 Gy radical dose (radical IOERT) or 12 Gy boosted electron beam radiotherapy and a routine fractionated dose of 50 Gy in 25 sessions of WBR (boosted IOERT). Those in the WBR group were administered 50Gy in 32 sessions. Physician-assessed cosmetic outcome was defined as the primary result and incidence of fat necrosis and fibrosis and post-operative chronic pain were secondary outcomes. Results: Post-operative cosmetic outcome scores and chronic pain, showed no significant difference between the two groups. The median cosmetic score in both groups was 9. Fat necrosis and fibrosis had significantly higher rates in the IOERT group (P. Value: 0.001). However, the majority (21/34 or 61.8%) of this complication was observed in the boosted IOERT subgroup and no statistical significance was recorded between the radical IOERT subgroup and the WBR group. Conclusions: In early-stage breast cancer treatment, radical IOERT has noninferiority compared to WBR in terms of cosmesis. Regarding fat necrosis and fibrosis, boosted IOERT was associated with higher rates in comparison to other groups. Therefore, radical IOERT seems to be a better treatment option for selected patients. © 2023, The Author(s).
Related Docs
4. Design, Construction and Performance Evaluation of the Target Tissue Thickness Measurement System in Intraoperative Radiotherapy for Breast Cancer, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research# Section A: Accelerators# Spectrometers# Detectors and Associated Equipment (2017)
8. Oncoplastic Breast Surgery; Is It Possible to Perform It in Every Medical Center?, International Journal of Cancer Management (2017)
Experts (# of related papers)