Effect of Ultrasonic Activation on the Efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy: Evaluation of Penetration Depth of Photosensitizer and Elimination of Enterococcus Faecalis Biofilms Publisher Pubmed



Niavarzi S¹ ; Pourhajibagher M² ; Khedmat S¹ ; Ghabraei S¹ ; Chiniforush N^{3, 4} ; Bahador A⁵ Show Affiliations
Source: Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy Published:2019

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to assess the effect of ultrasonic activation of photosensitizer on the efficacy of Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy (aPDT) against Enterococcus faecalis and penetration depth of photosensitizer. Materials and methods: In this ex vivo study, mature microbial biofilm of E. faecalis was formed in the root canals of 58 single-rooted single-canal mandibular incisors following their decoronation. The roots were longitudinally sectioned by a diamond disc and split into halves by a chisel. The E. faecalis biofilm was quantified and the penetration depth of photosensitizer was determined by the microbial viability assay and stereomicroscopic analysis in the following three study groups: (1) Ultrasonically activated 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) for 20 s, (2) aPDT using methylene blue (MB) plus 660 nm diode laser with 150 mW power for 1 minute, and (3) ultrasonically activated MB for 20 s followed by aPDT as in group 2. Independent sample t test and one way ANOVA were used to compare the dye penetration depth and microbial load, respectively in the apical and coronal regions among the groups. Results: The penetration depth of photosensitizer in group 3 was significantly greater than that in group 2 (P < 0.05). The E. faecalis count in all three experimental groups was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Groups 1 and 3 were significantly superior to group 2 in terms of reduction in microbial count but the difference between groups 1 and 3 was not significant (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Ultrasonic activation of photosensitizer in aPDT increases the penetration depth of photosensitizer into the dentinal tubules and enhances its antibacterial activity. Highlight: Ultrasonic activation of photosensitizer in aPDT enhances its penetration depth into dentinal tubules and increases antibacterial efficacy. There was no significant difference between antibacterial effects of aPDT + ultrasonic and ultrasonic activated NaOCl. © 2019 Elsevier B.V.