Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Diagnostic Accuracy of Circular Rna for Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis Publisher Pubmed



Dehghanbanadaki H1 ; Asili P1 ; Haji Ghadery A2 ; Mirahmad M1 ; Dehnavi AZ1 ; Parsaei A1 ; Baradaran HR3 ; Azami M4 ; Jose Justo Da Silva G5 ; Parvan R6 ; Moradi Y7
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Radiology, Advanced Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Research Center (ADIR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Ageing Clinical & Experimental Research Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom
  4. 4. Student Research Committee, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  6. 6. Institute for Experimental Medical Research, Oslo University Hospital and University of Oslo, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
  7. 7. Social Determinant of the Health Research Center, Research Institute for Health Development, Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences, Sanandaj, Iran

Source: BMC Medical Genomics Published:2023


Abstract

Background: This study aimed to investigate the pooled diagnostic ability of circular RNA (circRNA) molecules for diabetes mellitus. Methods: We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for relevant studies. A total of 2070 participants, including 775 diabetic patients and 1295 healthy individuals, from five studies were included in this meta-analysis. True positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative data were extracted to calculate pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. The Deeks’ funnel plot was applied for publication bias assessment, Cochran’s Q test and I2 index were applied for inter-study heterogeneity assessment. Besides, a subgroup analysis was performed for determining the source of heterogeneity between studies. P value < 0.05 was considered significance. All analysis were done by STATA version 14. Results: CircRNA presented a sensitivity of 76% (95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 66-84%), specificity of 77% (95%CI: 58-89%), positive LR of 3.25 (95%CI: 1.69–6.23), negative LR of 0.31 (95%CI: 0.21–0.46), DOR of 10.41 (95%CI: 4.26–25.41), and AUC of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.79–0.85) for diabetes mellitus detection. More specifically, hsa_circ_0054633 showed a sensitivity of 67% (95%CI: 53-81%) and a specificity of 82% (95%CI: 63-100%). Conclusion: CircRNAs show highly accurate diagnostic capability for type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus. High sensitivity of circRNAs introduces them as potential noninvasive biomarkers for early diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and their high specificity introduces them as potential therapeutic targets by regulation of their expression. © 2023, The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
12. Circular Rnas As Prognostic and Diagnostic Biomarkers in Renal Cell Carcinoma, Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis (2022)