Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Visual, Tomographic, and Biomechanical Outcomes of 360 Degrees Intracorneal Ring Implantation With and Without Corneal Crosslinking for Progressive Keratoconus: A 5-Year Follow-Up Publisher Pubmed



Mohammadpour M1 ; Khoshtinat N1 ; Khorraminejad M1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Eye Research Center, Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Cornea Published:2021


Abstract

Purpose:To evaluate the long-term (5 years) results of 360 degrees intracorneal ring (ICR) implantation with and without corneal crosslinking (CXL) in patients with progressive keratoconus (KCN).Method:This historical cohort study was performed on 35 eyes with progressive KCN, which was randomly divided into 2 groups. Fourteen patients were implanted only with ICR, and 21 patients with KCN were treated with ICR plus CXL simultaneously. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and refractive components were collected from patients' medical records. The biomechanical properties of patients were measured using the Corvis ST (Oculus, Inc, Weltzar, Germany). Corneal topography and aberrometry parameters were also recorded from the Pentacam HR device (Oculus).Results:Both UCVA and CDVA increased in both groups after ICR implantation; however, this improvement was more significant in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively). The mean improvement of CDVA in patients with ICR implantation with and without CXL was 0.56 ± 0.67 and 0.33 ± 0.61, respectively. A comparison of the long-term postoperative Tomographic and Biomechanical Index between 2 groups showed a better result in the ICR plus CXL group (P = 0.012). Topographic findings of the anterior corneal surface (flat-K, steep-K, mean-K, and astigmatism) after surgery were significantly better than before surgery in both groups (P < 0.05).Conclusions:Although ICR implantation alone might halt the KCN progression with acceptable visual, topographic, and biomechanical outcomes, the combination of ICR and CXL has an adjuvant and synergistic effect, especially in long-term follow-up. © 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
9. Long-Term Results of Myoring Implantation in Patients With Keratoconus, Clinical and Experimental Optometry (2021)
16. Myoring Implantation in Keratoconic Patients: 3 Years Follow-Up Data, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2016)