Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Mapping Eortc-Qlq-C30 and Qlq-Cr29 Onto Eq-5D-5L in Colorectal Cancer Patients Publisher Pubmed



Ameri H1 ; Yousefi M2 ; Yaseri M3 ; Nahvijou A1, 4 ; Arab M1 ; Akbari Sari A1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Management and Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Iranian Center of Excellence in Health Management, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Health Economics Department, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Cancer Research Center, Cancer Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer Published:2020


Abstract

Purpose: Patient-level utility data are needed for cost-utility analysis; in oncology, however, the data are commonly gathered using disease-specific questionnaires that are often not appropriate. Present study aimed to derive an algorithm which can map the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales and the Colorectal Cancer-Specific Quality Of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-CR29) scales onto the EuroQoL 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) values in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Methods: Using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) model, a cross-sectional dataset of 252 patients with CRC were gathered from three academic centers of cancer treatment in Tehran in 2017. The predicted R2 (Pred R2) and adjusted R2 (Adj R2) are used to evaluate model goodness of fit. Additionally, mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), Spearman’s correlation coefficients (ρ), and intraclass correlation (ICC) are applied to assess predictive ability of models. The tenfold cross-validation procedure was applied for validation models. Results: According to the results of our study, the model C4 from EORTC QLQ-C30 was the best predictive model (Pred R2 = 66.57%, Adj R2 = 67.67%, RMSE = 0.10173, MAE = 0.07840). Also, the model R4 from QLQ-CR29 performed the best for EQ-5D-5L (Adj R2 = 48.42%, Pred R2 = 45.54%, MAE = 0.10051, RMSE = 0.12997). Conclusions: The mapping algorithm successfully mapped the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 scales onto the EQ-5D-5L values; therefore, it enables policymakers to convert cancer-specific questionnaires scores to the preference-based scores. © 2019, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Other Related Docs
9. Health-Related Quality of Life Measured Using the Eq-5D-3L: Iranian Population Norms, Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (2024)
16. Relationship Between Spiritual Health and Quality of Life in Patients With Cancer, Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (2015)