Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Covid-19 and Comparative Health Policy Learning; the Experience of 10 Countries Publisher Pubmed



Raoofi A1 ; Takian A1, 2, 3 ; Haghighi H1 ; Rajizadeh A4 ; Rezaei Z5 ; Radmerikhi S6 ; Olyaeemanesh A3, 7 ; Sari AA1, 8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Health Management, Policy & Economics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Global Health & Public Policy, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Health Equity Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Health Services Management Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  5. 5. Department of Food Hygiene and Aquaculture, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran
  6. 6. Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Health Economics, National Institute of Health Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Head of the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Archives of Iranian Medicine Published:2021


Abstract

Background: Since December 2019, the world has been facing one of the most critical health threats of the last decades. In March 2021, the official number of deaths passed 2.6 million worldwide. Most countries have developed policies to control the disease. Nevertheless, countries have experienced different outcomes related to their various adapted policies. Complementing our first report, in this article, we report our findings of comparing the policies adopted to combat coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Iran, with those from nine selected countries, including China, Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Germany, the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Italy, to draw evidence-informed policy lessons. Methods: This is a qualitative study conducted based on document analysis related to COVID-19 policies in Iran and nine selected countries. Using a deductive approach, data were extracted and analyzed based on the components of the WHO Building Blocks Framework. Finally, we compared the Iranian policies with the nine selected countries. Results: Documents analysis revealed a spectrum of policies, which have led to a variety of outcomes. Based on our findings, three main strategies (widespread testing, comprehensive contact tracing, and timely measures) were the most effective directions to combat COVID-19. Conclusion: The experience of the first and second waves of COVID-19 showed that the risk of coronavirus is serious and will continue until a vaccine or decisive treatment is achieved. Therefore, countries are required to adopt appropriate and tailored policies to deal with this crisis effectively. Applying the experiences from the previous waves is essential for more efficient performance in the likely upcoming waves. © 2021 The Author(s).
Other Related Docs
9. Insecure Employment Contracts During the Covid-19 Pandemic and the Need for Participation in Policy Making, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (2021)
24. Covid-19: Features, Clinical Course and Concerns, Journal of Cellular and Molecular Anesthesia (2020)
29. Ensuring Adequate Health Financing to Prevent and Control the Covid-19 in Iran, International Journal for Equity in Health (2020)
31. Covid-19 Epidemic: Hospital-Level Response, Nursing Practice Today (2020)