Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Causal Effects of Intensive Lifestyle and Metformin Interventions on Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Pre-Diabetic People: An Application of G-Estimation Pubmed



Salimi Y1, 2 ; Fotouhi A1 ; Mohammad K1 ; Mansournia N3 ; Mansournia MA1
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Archives of Iranian Medicine Published:2017


Abstract

Background: In the presence of non-adherence, intention-to-treat analysis preserves randomization, but does not lead to a valid comparison of outcome between the assigned groups. Using a reanalysisof Diabetes Prevention Program, this study aimed to estimate the causal effect of treatment with intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin vs. placebo on blood pressure and lipid profile using G-estimation after accounting for non-adherence. Methods: The Diabetes Prevention Program randomized 3,052 pre-diabetic individuals to metformin (N = 1015), placebo (N = 1014), or an intensive lifestyle intervention (N = 1023). G-estimation was used to estimate the causal effect of intensive lifestyle intervention or metformin vs. placebo on blood pressure and lipid profile in 2,973 patients who had adherence data. For comparison, we also performed the standard intention-to-treat analysis. Result: The G-estimation results showed that intensive lifestyle substantially improves systolic and diastolic blood pressure and lipid profile. The G-estimates of the effects of metformin vs. placebo as well as intensive lifestyle intervention vs. metformin on blood pressure and lipid profile were also stronger than the intention-to-treat effect estimates. Conclusion: G-estimation suggests that intensive lifestyle modification improves known risk factors for cardiovascular disease, including systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, triglyceride, and HDL levels more than what standard ITT analysis suggests. Adherence to the assigned treatment should be measured in all randomized trials, and G-estimation should be the standard analysis of randomized trialswith substantial non-adherence. © 2017, Academy of Medical Sciences of I.R. Iran. All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
9. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2018)
31. Risk Ratio Estimation in Longitudinal Studies, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2019)
35. Knowledge Gaps in Diabetes Research: An Evidence Mapping of the Literature, Journal of Diabetes and Metabolic Disorders (2022)
46. Biases in Randomized Trials, Epidemiology (2017)
49. The Bias of Standard Methods in Estimating Causal Effect, Iranian Journal of Epidemiology (2017)