Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Estimating Effect of Obesity on Stroke Using G-Estimation: The Aric Study Publisher Pubmed



Shakiba M1 ; Mansournia MA2 ; Kaufman JS3
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Cardiovascular Diseases Research Center, School of Health, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
  2. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada

Source: Obesity Published:2019


Abstract

Objective : This study quantified the obesity-stroke relationship by appropriately adjusting for time-varying confounders using G-estimation. Methods : A total of 13,975 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study were included. General obesity (GOB) was defined as BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2; abdominal obesity (AOB) was defined as waist circumference ≥ 102 cm in men and ≥ 88 cm in women and waist to hip ratio ≥ 0.9 in men and ≥ 0.85 in women. The effects of obesity on stroke were estimated using G-estimation and compared with accelerated failure time models using three modeling strategies. Results : The first accelerated failure time model adjusted for baseline covariates excluding metabolic mediators of obesity showed increased risk of stroke for all measures of obesity. Further adjustment for hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and lipid profiles resulted in decreasing hazard ratios (HRs) with intervals that included the null value for all measures of obesity. G-estimated HRs were 1.60 (95% CI: 1.08-2.40), 1.43 (95% CI: 1.14-1.99), and 1.99 (95% CI: 1.50-2.91) for GOB and AOB based on waist circumference and waist to hip ratio. Conclusions : Both GOB and AOB affected the risk of stroke. The magnitude of the estimates was larger when modeled by G-estimation than when using standard models, suggesting that bias from mishandling of time-varying confounding was toward the null. © 2019 The Obesity Society
Experts (# of related papers)
Other Related Docs
15. Interaction Contrasts and Collider Bias, American Journal of Epidemiology (2022)
16. Causal Methods for Observational Research: A Primer, Archives of Iranian Medicine (2018)
19. Causal Diagrams for Immortal Time Bias, International Journal of Epidemiology (2021)
22. Case–Control Matching on Confounders Revisited, European Journal of Epidemiology (2023)
36. Using Causal Diagrams for Biomedical Research, Annals of Emergency Medicine (2023)