Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Comparison of Gauze Packing, Sponge-Based, and Hemostatic Surgicel Wound Stasis Dressings to Treat Hemorrhages From Grade Iv Liver Injuries: An Experimental Study Publisher



Lashkarizadeh MM1 ; Ghaedi A2, 3 ; Abolghasemi H4 ; Rabiee M5 ; Mehrabani D6 ; Ahadian S5 ; Bazrgar A3 ; Moqbel Esfahani S3 ; Paydar S2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Shiraz Organ Transplant Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  2. 2. Trauma Research Center, Shahid Rajaee (Emtiaz) Trauma Hospital, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  3. 3. Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  4. 4. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS), Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary & Liver Transplantation, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Iran
  5. 5. Stem Cell Technology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Genetics, Islamic Azad University, Shahre-Kord Branch, Share-Kord, Iran

Source: Heliyon Published:2024


Abstract

Background: Uncontrolled bleeding is still the major factor leading to preventable deaths following trauma. This study sought to assess the effectiveness of mini sponge-based wound stasis, cellulose-based local hemostatic, and traditional gauze dressings for the control of hemorrhages resulting from grade 4 liver injuries in rats. Methods: Thirty Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into three equal groups. In the first group, a liver laceration was treated with gauze packing. The second group received XStat minisponge dressing (MDS), and the third group was administered a combination of MDS dressing and Surgicel hemostatic agent. After gaining access to the intra-abdominal cavity, a liver laceration measuring 10 mm in length, 5 mm in depth, and extending to the middle lobe was created. The dressings were removed after 2 and 10 min to assess the amount of bleeding, and any bleeding was documented again after 48 h. Intraperitoneal adhesions were evaluated during euthanasia. Results: At 2 min post-injury, the gauze packing group had an average bleeding volume of 0.97 ± 0.15 mL, compared to 1.08 ± 0.25 mL in the MDS group (P = 0.26) and 1.02 ± 0.18 mL in the MDS + Surgicel group (P = 0.69). At 10 min, the bleeding volumes were 0.13 ± 0.05 mL, 0.22 ± 0.01 mL (P = 0.09), and 0.14 ± 0.05 mL (P = 0.19), respectively. At 48 h, significant differences were observed in bleeding volumes (gauze: 0.55 ± 0.18 mL, MDS: 1.15 ± 0.21 mL, MDS + Surgicel: 0.82 ± 0.06 mL, P < 0.001). Mortality rates after 14 days were 0 % in the gauze packing group, 60 % in the MDS group (P = 0.001), and 60 % in the MDS + Surgicel group (P = 0.001). The gauze packing group displayed no adhesions, while the other groups exhibited adhesions in the liver, bowel, omentum, and abdominal wall. Conclusion: Our results indicate that, when it comes to managing bleeding in severe liver injuries, traditional gauze packing remains the tried-and-true method, showing superior effectiveness in terms of blood loss and mortality when compared to XStat minisponge dressings and the fibrillar Surgicel hemostatic agents. © 2024 The Authors