Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share By
Near Work, Screen Time, Outdoor Time and Myopia in Schoolchildren in the Sunflower Myopia Aeec Consortium Publisher Pubmed



Lanca C1, 2 ; Yam JC3 ; Jiang WJ4 ; Tham YC1, 5 ; Hassan Emamian M6 ; Tan CS7 ; Guo Y8 ; Liu H9 ; Zhong H10 ; Zhu D11 ; Hu YY12 ; Saxena R13 ; Hashemi H14 ; Chen LJ2 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Lanca C1, 2
  2. Yam JC3
  3. Jiang WJ4
  4. Tham YC1, 5
  5. Hassan Emamian M6
  6. Tan CS7
  7. Guo Y8
  8. Liu H9
  9. Zhong H10
  10. Zhu D11
  11. Hu YY12
  12. Saxena R13
  13. Hashemi H14
  14. Chen LJ2
  15. Wong TY1, 5, 15, 16
  16. Cheng CY1, 5, 15
  17. Pang CP3
  18. Zhu H9
  19. Pan CW17
  20. Liang YB18
  21. Fotouhi A19
  22. Bi HS4
  23. Jonas JB20
  24. Saw SM1, 5, 7

Source: Acta Ophthalmologica Published:2022


Abstract

Purpose: To examine the association between near work, screen time including TV and outdoor time with myopia in children from the Sunflower Myopia Asian Eye Epidemiology Consortium (AEEC). Methods: We analysed AEEC cross-sectional data (12 241 children) on risk factors (near work, screen time including TV and outdoor time) and myopia of six population-based studies (China, Hong Kong and Singapore). Cycloplegic refraction and axial length (AL) measurements were included. Risk factors were determined using questionnaires. Data were pooled from each study, and multivariable regression analysis was performed to evaluate the associations between risks factors and myopia, spherical equivalent (SE) and AL. Results: Among the included children, 52.1% were boys, 98.1% were Chinese and 69.7% lived in urban areas. Mean±standard deviation (SD) for age was 8.8 ± 2.9 years, for SE was −0.14 ± 1.8 D and for AL was 23.3 ± 1.1 mm. Myopia prevalence was 30.6%. In multivariate analysis, more reading and writing (OR = 1.17; 95% CI, 1.11–1.24), more total near work (OR = 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02–1.09) and less outdoor time (OR = 0.82, 95% CI, 0.75–0.88) were associated with myopia (p’s < 0.05). These factors were similarly associated with SE and AL (p’s < 0.05), except for total near work and AL (p = 0.15). Screen time including TV was not significantly associated with myopia (p = 0.49), SE (p = 0.49) or AL (p = 0.83). Conclusion: In this study, increased reading and writing and decreased outdoor time were associated with myopia. Screen time may be a surrogate factor of near work or outdoor time, but further research is needed to assess its role as an independent risk factor for myopia. © 2021 Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Other Related Docs
6. Updates on Optical Strategies of Myopia Control, Journal of Modern Rehabilitation (2022)
10. Prevalence of Amblyopia and Refractive Errors Among Primary School Children, Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research (2015)
15. Lens Power in Iranian Schoolchildren: A Populationbased Study, British Journal of Ophthalmology (2018)