Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Efficacy of Levamisole With Standard Care Treatment Vs. Standard Care in Clinical Presentations of Non-Hospitalized Patients With Covid-19: A Randomized Clinical Trial Publisher



Asgardoon MH1, 2 ; Koochak HE2 ; Kazemigalougahi MH3 ; Dehnavi AZ2 ; Khodaei B4 ; Behkar A2 ; Dehpour AR5, 6 ; Khalili H7 ; Aminianfar M8
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Social Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Pathology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Experimental Medicine Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  6. 6. Department of Pharmacology, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  7. 7. Department of Pharmacotherapy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  8. 8. Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine Research Center (IDTMRC), Department of Aerospace and Subaquatic Medicine, AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Frontiers in Emergency Medicine Published:2022


Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of adding a 10-day course of levamisole (LVM) to the standard care compared with standard care alone, on the clinical status of COVID-19 patients with mild to moderate disease. Methods: In this randomized open-label trial, we enrolled non-hospitalized patients with mild to moderate COVID-19 at nine health centers in Tehran province, Iran, in 2021. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 10-day course of LVM with standard care (n=185) or standard care alone (n=180) in a 1:1 ratio. On days 1 to 10, LVM was administered orally at a dosage of 50 mg. The participants were called and followed on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 14. The measured parameters were general health condition, hospitalization rate, signs and symptoms, and adverse events. The generalized estimating equations model was used for analysis. Results: Among 507 randomized patients, 473 patients started the experiment and received LVM plus standard care or received the standard care alone; 385 patients included in the analysis; 346 (98%) patients completed the trial. The median age of the patients was 40 years [IQR: 32-50.75]; and 201 (55.1%) patiens were male. The mean age, sex ratio, and frequency of the underlying diseases of the patients in the two study groups had no statistically significant differences (P>0.05). Compared to the control group, LVM improved the general health condition of the patients (B=-0.635; 95% CI:-0.041,-0.329; P<0.001). Patients receiving LVM compared with standard care group had significantly lower odds of developing fever (OR=0.260; 95% CI: 0.113,0.599; P=0.002), chills (OR=0.223; 95% CI: 0.076,0.648; P=0.006), fatigue (OR=0.576; 95% CI: 0.346,0.960; P=0.034), and myalgia (OR=0.544; 95% CI: 0.317,0.932; P=0.027). No significant difference was observed in the rate of hospitalization. Although the intervention group had greater adverse effects than the control group, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusion: Findings of this study suggest that LVM has clinical benefits in improving patients’ health condition with mild to moderate COVID-19. © 2022 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.