Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! By
Internal and Marginal Adaptation of 3D Printed Interim Fixed Partial Dentures With Different Layer Thicknesses Publisher



Fg Arani Fateme GHORBANPOUR ; M Hasanzade MAHYA ; N Aminianpour NEGIN ; As Mostafavi Azam SADAT
Authors

Source: Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics Published:2025


Abstract

PURPOSE. The aim of this study was to compare the marginal and internal adaptation of polymethyl methacrylate interim fixed partial denture (FPD) restorations fabricated by three-dimensional (3D) printing with different layer thicknesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A standard typodont was scanned by a laboratory scanner. The maxillary left first premolar and first molar teeth received an all-ceramic full-coverage crown preparation, and the second premolar was removed to create a pontic space. The prepared teeth were then scanned, and metal dies were fabricated by a milling machine. Restorations were designed and fabricated in 3 groups (n = 12 in inch) with 25, 50 and 100 µm layer thicknesses.The marginal and internal gaps were measured by the replica technique. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA (ɑ = 0.05). RESULTS. The mean gap size (MGS) in the cervical area of premolar restorations was significantly higher in 100 µm than in 50 and 25 µm thicknesses (P < .05). The MGS in the marginal area of premolar restorations was significantly higher in 100 µm thickness than in 50 µm thickness (P < .05), with no statistically significant difference with 25 µm thickness (P > .05). The MGS at the occlusal and cervical areas of the molar restorations was significantly higher in 100 µm thickness than in 50 µm thickness (P < .05), with no statistically significant difference with 25 µm thickness (P > .05). CONCLUSION. Different thicknesses of additive layers in 3D printing affected the marginal and internal gaps. The smallest gap size was recorded in 50 µm layer thickness. [J Adv Prosthodont 2025;17:137-45] © 2025 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
Other Related Docs
8. Marginal Adaptation and Internal Fit of Posterior 3-Unit Zirconia Fpds Fabricated With Different Cad/Cam Systems, The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry (2017)
10. 3D Printing in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, 3D Printing in Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery (2021)