Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Marginal Fit of Monolithic Versus Layered Zirconia Crowns Assessed With 2 Marginal Gap Methods Publisher Pubmed



Fasih P1 ; Tavakolizadeh S2 ; Sedaghat Monfared M3 ; Sofimahmudi A4 ; Yari A5
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Post-graduate student, Department of Prosthodontics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Associate Professor, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Researcher, Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
  5. 5. Post-graduate student, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Published:2023


Abstract

Statement of problem: Zirconia can be used either monolithically or veneered with porcelain. However, whether veneering zirconia affects marginal fit is unclear. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the marginal fit of the monolithic and layered zirconia prostheses using 2 different assessment methods. Material and methods: An ideal complete crown with a chamfer finish line was prepared on an extracted maxillary central incisor. Two prosthesis designs, a framework and a monolithic design, and 2 marginal fit evaluation methods, the silicone replica and the triple scanning techniques, were used. In the first group, 10 crowns were fabricated with the framework design followed by porcelain veneering, and 10 crowns were fabricated monolithically in the second group. The marginal gap in each group was evaluated with both the silicone replica and triple scan methods. Data were statistically analyzed with a 2-way repeated measures ANOVA (α=.05). Results: A significant difference was found in the mean marginal gap by design type (P=.003), with the monolithic prostheses having lower mean marginal gaps (31.0 and 84.0 µm). However, both groups showed clinically acceptable marginal fit. No significant difference was found between the assessment methods (P=.092). Conclusions: Monolithic zirconia crowns had a better marginal fit than veneered zirconia frameworks. Both the replica and triple scan techniques for marginal gap assessment yielded similar results. © 2023 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Related Docs
View other Related Docs
1. Comparison of Marginal and Internal Adaptation in Endocrowns Milled From Translucent Zirconia and Zirconium Lithium Silicate, International Journal of Dentistry (2021)
2. Comparison of Three-Dimensional Digital Technique With Two-Dimensional Replica Method for Measuring Marginal and Internal Fit of Full Coverage Restorations, Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics (2020)
3. Effect of Die Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Copings: An in Vitro Study, Open Dentistry Journal (2021)
4. The Effect of Preparation Design on the Fracture Resistance and Adaptation of the Cerec Ceramic Endocrowns, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2023)
5. Comparison of the Marginal Discrepancy of Pfm Crowns in the Cad/Cam and Lost-Wax Fabrication Techniques by Triple Scanning, Dental and Medical Problems (2020)
6. Comparison of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Pmma Interim Crowns Printed With Different Layer Thicknesses in 3D-Printing Technique, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2023)
7. Marginal Adaptation of Implant Prostheses Fabricated by Different Materials in Excessive Crown Height Space Before and After Veneering, Frontiers in Dentistry (2021)
8. Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Endocrowns Fabricated From Three Different Cad/Cam Materials, European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2019)
Experts (# of related papers)
View all Related Experts
Marzieh Alikhasi (8)
Mahya Hasanzade (6)
Other Related Docs
9. Comparing Marginal Fit and Marginal Gap Between Sholder Bevel and 135° Finish Line Designs in Posterior Metal Ceramic Restoration Crowns, Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (2019)
10. Comparison of Internal Fit of Metal-Ceramic Crowns in Cad/Cam and Lost-Wax Techniques in All Fabrication Stages Through Replica Weighting, Triple Scanning, and Scanning Electron Microscope, Clinical and Experimental Dental Research (2022)
11. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation, Journal of Prosthodontics (2019)
12. How Adjustment Could Affect Internal and Marginal Adaptation of Cad/Cam Crowns Made With Different Materials, Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics (2020)
13. Fracture Strength and Three-Dimensional Marginal Evaluation of Biocompatible High-Performance Polymer Versus Pressed Lithium Disilicate Crowns, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2023)
14. Comparative Evaluation of the Internal and Marginal Adaptations of Cad/Cam Endocrowns and Crowns Fabricated From Three Different Materials, International Journal of Prosthodontics (2021)
15. Evaluating the Effect of Different Combination of Impression and Pouring Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Crowns; [Evaluacion Del Efecto De Diferentes Combinaciones De Materiales De Impresion Y Vertido En La Adaptacion Marginal E Interna De Las Coronas De Circonio.], Journal of Oral Research (2020)
16. Accuracy of Digital Impression Taking Using Intraoral Scanner Versus the Conventional Technique, Frontiers in Dentistry (2021)
17. In Vitro Comparison of Marginal and Internal Fit of Zirconia Copings Fabricated by One Cad/Cam System With Two Different Scanners, Frontiers in Dentistry (2021)
18. Fit of Cobalt-Chromium Copings Fabricated by the Selective Laser Melting Technology and Casting Method: A Comparative Evaluation Using a Profilometer, Dental Research Journal (2020)
19. Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Single Crowns and Fixed Dental Prostheses by Using Digital and Conventional Workflows: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry (2021)