Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Preventing Problematic Internet Use During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Consensus Guidance Publisher Pubmed



Kiraly O1 ; Potenza MN2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ; Stein DJ7 ; King DL8 ; Hodgins DC9 ; Saunders JB10 ; Griffiths MD11 ; Gjoneska B12 ; Billieux J13 ; Brand M14 ; Abbott MW15 ; Chamberlain SR16, 17 ; Corazza O18, 19 ; Burkauskas J20 Show All Authors
Authors
  1. Kiraly O1
  2. Potenza MN2, 3, 4, 5, 6
  3. Stein DJ7
  4. King DL8
  5. Hodgins DC9
  6. Saunders JB10
  7. Griffiths MD11
  8. Gjoneska B12
  9. Billieux J13
  10. Brand M14
  11. Abbott MW15
  12. Chamberlain SR16, 17
  13. Corazza O18, 19
  14. Burkauskas J20
  15. Sales CMD21
  16. Montag C22
  17. Lochner C23
  18. Grunblatt E24, 25, 26
  19. Wegmann E14
  20. Martinotti G27
  21. Lee HK28
  22. Rumpf HJ29
  23. Castrocalvo J30
  24. Rahimimovaghar A31
  25. Higuchi S32
  26. Menchon JM33
  27. Zohar J34
  28. Pellegrini L35, 36, 37
  29. Walitza S24, 25, 26
  30. Fineberg NA36, 37, 38
  31. Demetrovics Z1
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
  2. 2. Department of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
  3. 3. Child Study Center, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States
  4. 4. Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven, CT, United States
  5. 5. Connecticut Council on Problem Gambling, Wethersfield, CT, United States
  6. 6. Department of Neuroscience, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
  7. 7. SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry & Neuroscience Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  8. 8. College of Education, Psychology, & Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
  9. 9. Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
  10. 10. Centre for Youth Substance Abuse Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
  11. 11. Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, United Kingdom
  12. 12. Academy of Sciences and Arts of North Macedonia, Skopje, North Macedonia
  13. 13. Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
  14. 14. General Psychology: Cognition and Center for Behavioral Addiction Research (CeBAR), University of Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany
  15. 15. Gambling and Addictions Research Centre, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  16. 16. Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
  17. 17. Cambridgeshire & Peterborough NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
  18. 18. Department of Clinical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
  19. 19. Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
  20. 20. Laboratory of Behavioral Medicine, Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Palanga, Lithuania
  21. 21. Psychology and Education Sciences, Center for Psychology University of Porto, Portugal
  22. 22. Department of Molecular Psychology, Institute of Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
  23. 23. SA MRC Unit on Risk & Resilience in Mental Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, South Africa
  24. 24. Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Psychiatry Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  25. 25. Neuroscience Center Zurich, University of Zurich and the ETH, Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  26. 26. Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
  27. 27. Department of Neuroscience, Imaging, Clinical Sciences, ‘Gabriele d'Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Italy
  28. 28. Department of Psychiatry, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
  29. 29. Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University of Lubeck, Germany
  30. 30. Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatments, Faculty of Psychology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
  31. 31. Iranian National Center for Addiction Studies (INCAS), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  32. 32. National Hospital Organization Kurihama Medical and Addiction Center, National Center for Addiction Services Administration, Yokosuka, Japan
  33. 33. Department of Psychiatry, Bellvitge University Hospital-IDIBELL, University of Barcelona, Cibersam, Barcelona, Spain
  34. 34. Sackler Medical School, Tel Aviv University, Chaim Sheba Medical Center Tel Hashomer, Tel Aviv, Israel
  35. 35. Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
  36. 36. University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
  37. 37. Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom
  38. 38. University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom

Source: Comprehensive Psychiatry Published:2020


Abstract

As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many governments have introduced steps such as spatial distancing and “staying at home” to curb its spread and impact. The fear resulting from the disease, the ‘lockdown’ situation, high levels of uncertainty regarding the future, and financial insecurity raise the level of stress, anxiety, and depression experienced by people all around the world. Psychoactive substances and other reinforcing behaviors (e.g., gambling, video gaming, watching pornography) are often used to reduce stress and anxiety and/or to alleviate depressed mood. The tendency to use such substances and engage in such behaviors in an excessive manner as putative coping strategies in crises like the COVID-19 pandemic is considerable. Moreover, the importance of information and communications technology (ICT) is even higher in the present crisis than usual. ICT has been crucial in keeping parts of the economy going, allowing large groups of people to work and study from home, enhancing social connectedness, providing greatly needed entertainment, etc. Although for the vast majority ICT use is adaptive and should not be pathologized, a subgroup of vulnerable individuals are at risk of developing problematic usage patterns. The present consensus guidance discusses these risks and makes some practical recommendations that may help diminish them. © 2020