Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Acupuncture or Cupping Plus Standard Care Versus Standard Care in Moderate to Severe Covid-19 Patients: An Assessor-Blinded, Randomized, Controlled Trial Publisher



Alipour R1, 2 ; Jamalimoghadamsiahkali S3 ; Karimi M1 ; Asadi A4 ; Ghaem H5 ; Adelmehraban MS1, 2 ; Kazemi AH1, 6
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Traditional Medicine, School of Persian medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Traditional Persian Medicine and Complementary Medicine (PerCoMed) Student's Association, Student's Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Ziaeian Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  4. 4. Department of Infectious Diseases, Shohadaye Pakdasht Hospital, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  5. 5. Non-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Epidemiology Department, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
  6. 6. International School, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China

Source: Integrative Medicine Research Published:2022


Abstract

Background: Non-pharmacological strategies that have been proposed by complementary medical systems, can be effective in management of COVID-19. Methods: This study was designed as a three-arm, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. A total of 139 hospitalized COVID-19 patients were randomly assigned into three groups: (1) acupuncture (ACUG), (2) cupping (CUPG), and (3) control (CTRG). All participants received conventional treatment. The primary study endpoint included changes in respiratory signs including oxygen saturation (SpO2) and respiratory rate (RR). The secondary endpoints were COVID-19-related hospitalization duration and serious adverse events such as intensive care unit (ICU) admission, intubation or death, all up to day 30. Also, improvements in cough, dyspnea, chest tightness, oxygen demand, anorexia, headache, weakness, sore throat, and myalgia were evaluated. Results: Forty-two patients in ACUG, 44 patients in CUPG, and 42 patients in CTRG completed the trial. After 3 days, SpO2 and RR improved significantly in CUPG and ACUG compared with CTRG (effect size: 8.49 (6.4 to 10.57) and 8.51 (6.67 to 10.34), respectively: p<0.001). Compared with CTRG, patients in CUPG and ACUG recovered faster (mean difference: 6.58 (4.8 to 8.35) and 9.16 (7.16 to 11.15), respectively) and except for two patients in ACUG who were admitted to ICU, none of patients in ACUG or CUPG needed ICU or intubation (p<0.001 in comparison to CTRG). Amelioration of clinical COVID-19 related symptoms reached a high level of statistical significance in CUPG and ACUG in comparison with CTRG (p<0.01). Conclusion: Cupping and acupuncture are promising safe and effective therapies in management of COVID-19. Trial registration: This study was registered at Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials: IRCT20201127049504N1 (https://en.irct.ir/trial/52621). © 2022
Experts (# of related papers)