Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Science Communicator Platform

Stay connected! Follow us on X network (Twitter):
Share this content! On (X network) By
Synthesis, Molecular Docking Study, and Cytotoxic Activity of 3,4-Diaryl-5-(4-Pyridinyl)-1,2,4-Oxadiazole Publisher Pubmed



Zareian B1 ; Ghadbeighi S1 ; Amirhamzeh A2 ; Ostad SN3 ; Shafiee A1 ; Amini M1, 2
Authors
Show Affiliations
Authors Affiliations
  1. 1. Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  2. 2. Drug Design and Development Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
  3. 3. Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Source: Medicinal Chemistry Published:2016


Abstract

Background: Triaryl oxadiazoles have been proven to be useful agents against various types of cancer cell lines. Nevertheless, their mechanism of action is not fully understood. Objective: Synthesis and cytotoxic activity of a new group of triaryl oxadiazoles; 3,4-diaryl-5-(4-pyridinyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives, will be discussed in this study. Their cytotoxic activity has been examined in 4 different cell lines by MTT method. Method: 3,4-Diaryl-5-(4-pyridinyl)-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives were prepared from condensation of different imines with 4-substituted benzohydroxyiminoyl chlorides. The antiproliferative activity of the final compounds was examined in MCF-7, AGS, HT-29 and NIH3T3 cell lines by MTT assay, using different concentrations of each compound to determine their IC50. The cytotoxic activity of paclitaxel, doxorubicin and combretastatin A-4 was evaluated as positive controls. Results: All compounds demonstrated cytotoxic activity in mentioned cell lines, in a dose dependent manner. Among all, 6d-2 showed the highest cytotoxicity in AGS and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 19.84 and 9.91 respectively and 6c-2 was the most potent in HT-29 with IC50 27.60. In addition, 6c-1, one of the most potent compounds, showed an interestingly low cytotoxic effect on NIH3T3 cell line, which is a noncancerous cell line. In the molecular modeling study, all compounds had comparable binding energy in Colchicine binding site and 6c-2 had the best-predicted binding energy. Conclusion: Together, our data suggest that the synthesized compounds have a partially selective mechanism of action against cancer cells and possibly a lower toxic effect on normal cells, making them interesting candidates for the synthesis of new anticancer agents. © 2016 Bentham Science Publishers.